Vaithiyalingam vs Vimala — 15/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O21R22,48,46(a). Disposed: Contested--Terminated on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

EP - Execution Petition

CNR: TNKI130001122025

e-Filing Number

25-09-2025

Filing Number

122/2025

Filing Date

08-Oct-2025

Registration No

15/2025

Registration Date

08-Oct-2025

Court

District Munsif Court, Uthangarai

Judge

1-District Munsif, Uthangarai

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Terminated

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O21R22,48,46(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vaithiyalingam

    Adv. Saravanan Arumugam

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vimala

  2. 2.Child programme Development Officer

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    The District Munsif Court of Uthangarai terminated Execution Petition No. 15/2025 on 12.03.2026 after the petitioner Vaithiyalingam's counsel filed a memo of full satisfaction, confirming that the awarded amount had been completely paid. The case was closed as fully satisfied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Munsif, Uthangarai

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    For further Proceedings

    District Munsif, Uthangarai

  5. 05-Feb-2026

    Issue of Service

    District Munsif, Uthangarai

  6. 22-Jan-2026

    Enquiry

    District Munsif, Uthangarai

  7. 07-Jan-2026

    Enquiry

    District Munsif, Uthangarai

  8. 18-Dec-2025

    Enquiry

    District Munsif, Uthangarai

  9. 12-Nov-2025

    Enquiry

    District Munsif, Uthangarai

  10. 06-Nov-2025

    Part Heard

    District Munsif, Uthangarai

  11. 08-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 08-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 15/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The District Munsif Court of Uthangarai terminated Execution Petition No. 15/2025 on 12.03.2026 after the petitioner Vaithiyalingam's counsel filed a memo of full satisfaction, confirming that the awarded amount had been completely paid. The case was closed as fully satisfied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case