Murugan vs Parvathi — 84/2022
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section O7R1to6. Status: Trial. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNKI130001122022
Next Hearing
22nd June 2026
Filing Number
159/2022
Filing Date
17-11-2022
Registration No
84/2022
Registration Date
21-11-2022
Court
District Munsif Court, Uthangarai
Judge
1-District Munsif, Uthangarai
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Murugan
Adv. CHANDRASEKARAN.R
Respondent(s)
Parvathi
Vasugi
Madhu
Tahsildar, Uthangarai
The District Collector, Krishnagiri
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif, Uthangarai
Trial
Trial
Trial
Appearance
Appearance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Trial |
| 12-03-2026 | Trial |
| 10-02-2026 | Trial |
| 21-01-2026 | Appearance |
| 17-12-2025 | Appearance |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 84/2022 Outcome: The interlocutory application (I.A. No. 03 of 2024) is allowed. The ex parte decree dated 29.09.2023 passed against defendants 4 & 5 (Tahsildar and District Collector) is set aside with no cost. Key Details: The suit involved a declaration of legal heirship. Defendants 4 & 5 sought to set aside the ex parte decree, claiming summonses were misplaced preventing their appearance. The court found their reason satisfactory and noted they filed a written statement showing genuine interest in contesting the suit. The respondent (Murugan/plaintiff) endorsed no counter-objection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 84/2022 Outcome: The interlocutory application (I.A. No. 03 of 2024) is allowed. The ex parte decree dated 29.09.2023 passed against defendants 4 & 5 (Tahsildar and District Collector) is set aside with no cost. Key Details: The suit involved a declaration of legal heirship. Defendants 4 & 5 sought to set aside the ex parte decree, claiming summonses were misplaced preventing their appearance. The court found their reason satisfactory and noted they filed a written statement showing genuine interest in contesting the suit. The respondent (Murugan/plaintiff) endorsed no counter-objection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts