Chinnathambi @ Chinnasamy vs Saravanan and others — 82/2022

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section O7R1to6. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNKI130000852022

Arguments

Next Hearing

03rd June 2026

Filing Number

117/2022

Filing Date

22-09-2022

Registration No

82/2022

Registration Date

18-11-2022

Court

District Munsif Court, Uthangarai

Judge

1-District Munsif, Uthangarai

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section O7R1to6

Petitioner(s)

Chinnathambi @ Chinnasamy

Adv. BALACHANDER.B

Respondent(s)

Saravanan and others

Kalpana

Sub Registrar

The District Collector, krishnagiri

Rajikrishnan

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Munsif, Uthangarai

22-04-2026

Arguments

09-04-2026

Arguments

24-03-2026

Arguments

12-03-2026

For further Proceedings

17-02-2026

Part Heard

Interim Orders

12-03-2026
Copy of Oral Evidence/Deposition

This document is a witness deposition record, not a case judgment or order. It records the cross-examination testimony of Rajkrishnan (DW2/Defendant's Witness 2), son of Chinnasamuy, on 12.03.2026 before the District Munsif, Uthangarai in O.S. No. 82/2022. The witness testified regarding a land dispute where petitioner Chinnathambi alleged respondent Saravanan received more land; the witness denied transferring his own document and claimed to have sold land per plaintiff's patta after obtaining proper documents, though contradictions emerged regarding survey numbers and registration details. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This document is a witness deposition record, not a case judgment or order. It records the cross-examination testimony of Rajkrishnan (DW2/Defendant's Witness 2), son of Chinnasamuy, on 12.03.2026 before the District Munsif, Uthangarai in O.S. No. 82/2022. The witness testified regarding a land dispute where petitioner Chinnathambi alleged respondent Saravanan received more land; the witness denied transferring his own document and claimed to have sold land per plaintiff's patta after obtaining proper documents, though contradictions emerged regarding survey numbers and registration details. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif Court, Uthangarai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case