Sudha vs Chelliyammal — 62/2021
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section O7R1to6. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNKI130000712021
Next Hearing
10th June 2026
Filing Number
110/2021
Filing Date
22-09-2021
Registration No
62/2021
Registration Date
01-10-2021
Court
District Munsif Court, Uthangarai
Judge
1-District Munsif, Uthangarai
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sudha
Adv. S.Dhandapani
Suresh
Respondent(s)
Chelliyammal
Ravikumar
Deeparasan
Thasildhar
District Collector Krishnagiri
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif, Uthangarai
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 08-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 26-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-02-2026 | Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: OS.62 of 2021 Document Type: Record of witness deposition (cross-examination), not a final court order. This document records the cross-examination of Sudha (PW-1), a witness in a civil suit before the District Munsif Court, Uthangarai on 29.10.2025. The case involves a matrimonial dispute where Sudha testified regarding claims that she and her mother were married to Ramanujam, with the respondents (Chelliyammal, Ravikumar, and Deeparasan) claiming to be his heirs. During cross-examination, Sudha's testimony was challenged on inconsistencies regarding marriage documentation, voter registration details, and the validity of previous court orders. No final judgment or order was issued in this document—it is merely a deposition record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: OS.62 of 2021 Document Type: Record of witness deposition (cross-examination), not a final court order. This document records the cross-examination of Sudha (PW-1), a witness in a civil suit before the District Munsif Court, Uthangarai on 29.10.2025. The case involves a matrimonial dispute where Sudha testified regarding claims that she and her mother were married to Ramanujam, with the respondents (Chelliyammal, Ravikumar, and Deeparasan) claiming to be his heirs. During cross-examination, Sudha's testimony was challenged on inconsistencies regarding marriage documentation, voter registration details, and the validity of previous court orders. No final judgment or order was issued in this document—it is merely a deposition record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts