Ramasamy vs Tholan — 39/2019
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section O7Rule1to6. Status: Amendment. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNKI130000682019
Next Hearing
04th June 2026
Filing Number
71/2019
Filing Date
25-04-2019
Registration No
39/2019
Registration Date
25-04-2019
Court
District Munsif Court, Uthangarai
Judge
1-District Munsif, Uthangarai
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ramasamy
Adv. LAKSHMANAN.E
Chennammal
Amaravathi
Respondent(s)
Tholan
Chinnathamani
Chennammal
Neducheliyan
Chennammal
Selvam
Selvarani
Vinoth
Kesavan
Dhanapal
Murugan
Thiruppathi
Manni
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif, Uthangarai
Amendment
Amendment
Amendment
Amendment
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Amendment |
| 21-04-2026 | Amendment |
| 02-04-2026 | Amendment |
| 12-03-2026 | Amendment |
| 06-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 39/2019 The District Munsif Court at Uthangarai allowed an interlocutory application filed by petitioners Ramasamy, Chennammal, and Amaravathi to implead seven legal heirs (Venkatesan, Karunanithi, Vetrivel, Sakarabani, Vediyammal, Deivanai, and Valli) as defendants 14-20. The original first defendant, Tholan, died on 23.03.2022 while the partition suit was pending. Since the suit involves partition of the deceased's estate, the court found it necessary to implead all legal heirs irrespective of whether they claim a share. The court allowed the application without costs, finding no genuine dispute regarding the death or legal heirship of the proposed parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 39/2019 The District Munsif Court at Uthangarai allowed an interlocutory application filed by petitioners Ramasamy, Chennammal, and Amaravathi to implead seven legal heirs (Venkatesan, Karunanithi, Vetrivel, Sakarabani, Vediyammal, Deivanai, and Valli) as defendants 14-20. The original first defendant, Tholan, died on 23.03.2022 while the partition suit was pending. Since the suit involves partition of the deceased's estate, the court found it necessary to implead all legal heirs irrespective of whether they claim a share. The court allowed the application without costs, finding no genuine dispute regarding the death or legal heirship of the proposed parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts