K Chennaiyan vs Sivaraj — 100058/2018
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section O7RULE1to6CPC. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 21st April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNKI130000652018
Filing Number
65/2018
Filing Date
17-07-2018
Registration No
100058/2018
Registration Date
17-07-2018
Court
District Munsif Court, Uthangarai
Judge
1-District Munsif, Uthangarai
Decision Date
21st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
K Chennaiyan
Adv. MURUGESAN.M
Respondent(s)
Sivaraj
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif, Uthangarai
Disposed
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 02-04-2026 | Judgement |
| 26-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 12-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 03-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: K Chennaiyan v. Sivaraj (Case 100058/2018) The District Munsif Court, Uthangarai dismissed the plaintiff's suit for recovery of ₹60,000 lent to defendant on June 20, 2016, along with interest. The court found that the promissory note relied upon by plaintiff was forged/fabricated, as evidenced by forensic handwriting analysis showing the signature did not match the defendant's authentic exemplars. The defendant successfully proved the loan was actually borrowed from plaintiff's son Mani, not the plaintiff himself, making the forged promissory note invalid basis for recovery. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: K Chennaiyan v. Sivaraj (Case 100058/2018) The District Munsif Court, Uthangarai dismissed the plaintiff's suit for recovery of ₹60,000 lent to defendant on June 20, 2016, along with interest. The court found that the promissory note relied upon by plaintiff was forged/fabricated, as evidenced by forensic handwriting analysis showing the signature did not match the defendant's authentic exemplars. The defendant successfully proved the loan was actually borrowed from plaintiff's son Mani, not the plaintiff himself, making the forged promissory note invalid basis for recovery. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts