Chinnasamy vs Buvaneshwari — 39/2025
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section O 7 R 1 to 6. Status: Ex-Parte Evidence. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNKI130000592025
Next Hearing
03rd June 2026
Filing Number
62/2025
Filing Date
19-06-2025
Registration No
39/2025
Registration Date
19-06-2025
Court
District Munsif Court, Uthangarai
Judge
1-District Munsif, Uthangarai
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Chinnasamy
Adv. VADIVEL.K
Respondent(s)
Buvaneshwari
Thirunavukkarasu
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif, Uthangarai
Ex-Parte Evidence
Ex-Parte Evidence
Ex-Parte Evidence
Ex-Parte Evidence
Ex-Parte Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Ex-Parte Evidence |
| 10-04-2026 | Ex-Parte Evidence |
| 01-04-2026 | Ex-Parte Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Ex-Parte Evidence |
| 10-02-2026 | Ex-Parte Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Chinnasamy v. Buvaneshwari & Thirunavukkarasu (O.S. 39/2025) Outcome: Interim injunction (temporary restraining order) GRANTED in favor of petitioner Chinnasamy. The District Munsif Court prohibited respondents Buvaneshwari and Thirunavukkarasu from interfering with or obstructing Chinnasamy's exclusive possession and enjoyment of his ancestral agricultural property (Patta No. 69). The court specifically restrained them from removing PVC pipelines they had unlawfully installed through his land to access water from a well on their adjacent property, and barred any further trespassing or obstruction pending final judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Chinnasamy v. Buvaneshwari & Thirunavukkarasu (O.S. 39/2025) Outcome: Interim injunction (temporary restraining order) GRANTED in favor of petitioner Chinnasamy. The District Munsif Court prohibited respondents Buvaneshwari and Thirunavukkarasu from interfering with or obstructing Chinnasamy's exclusive possession and enjoyment of his ancestral agricultural property (Patta No. 69). The court specifically restrained them from removing PVC pipelines they had unlawfully installed through his land to access water from a well on their adjacent property, and barred any further trespassing or obstruction pending final judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts