Santhammal vs Kannu Gounder Advocate - K vadivel — 100081/1996

Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 37(2),ofTNCFAct. Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.

OS - Original Suit (Title)

CNR: TNKI130000011972

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

Next Hearing

04th June 2026

Filing Number

100081/1996

Filing Date

23-03-1972

Registration No

100081/1996

Registration Date

09-01-1996

Court

District Munsif Court, Uthangarai

Judge

1-District Munsif, Uthangarai

Acts & Sections

CodeofCivilProcedure Section 37(2),ofTNCFAct

Petitioner(s)

Santhammal

Adv. K.Ramasamy

Ramakkal

Respondent(s)

Kannu Gounder Advocate - K vadivel

Rama Goundan

Adv. K.Murugan

Devakiammal

Sakthi

Chitra

Manjula

Santhi

Periyappa

Sakthivel

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Munsif, Uthangarai

30-04-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

09-04-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

07-04-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

17-03-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

12-03-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

Interim Orders

13-08-2025
Copy of Judgment/Order

Case Summary: 100081/1996 Outcome: The interlocutory application (I.A.No. 07 of 2025) was allowed. The District Munsif granted permission to amend the final decree application (I.A.No. 95 of 1996) by adding the legal representatives of the deceased first respondent (Ramakkal). No costs were awarded. The amendment was deemed consequential in nature, requiring no formal application per High Court of Madras directive. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 100081/1996 Outcome: The interlocutory application (I.A.No. 07 of 2025) was allowed. The District Munsif granted permission to amend the final decree application (I.A.No. 95 of 1996) by adding the legal representatives of the deceased first respondent (Ramakkal). No costs were awarded. The amendment was deemed consequential in nature, requiring no formal application per High Court of Madras directive. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif Court, Uthangarai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case