S.I. of Police, Uthangarai P.S. vs Ammashi — 311/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 27th March 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNKI120021022023
Filing Number
2101/2023
Filing Date
28-Apr-2023
Registration No
311/2023
Registration Date
28-Apr-2023
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Uthangarai
Judge
1-Judicial Magistrate, Uthangarai
Decision Date
27-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 28-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
409
Police Station
UTHANGARAI POLICE STATION
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.S.I. of Police, Uthangarai P.S.
Adv. Additional Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ammashi
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
27-Mar-2026
Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF
Case Summary: S.I. of Police, Uthangarai P.S. v. Ammashi (311/2023) The court acquitted defendant Ammashi of charges under IPC sections 279 (rash driving) and 337 (causing hurt) in a motor vehicle collision case. The court found that while a road accident occurred on 08.09.2022 near Uthangarai, the key eyewitness (complainant Palaniswamy) gave contradictory testimony, initially claiming settlement with the accused, then recanting during cross-examination. The second eyewitness (Suguosh Kumar) similarly gave conflicting statements. Without reliable direct evidence linking the defendant to reckless driving causing injury, the court determined the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt and released the accused on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate, Uthangarai
-
25-Mar-2026
Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF
-
25-Mar-2026
Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF
-
25-Mar-2026
Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF
-
25-Mar-2026
Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF
-
25-Mar-2026
Trial
Judicial Magistrate, Uthangarai
-
12-Mar-2026
Trial
Judicial Magistrate, Uthangarai
-
06-Feb-2026
Trial
Judicial Magistrate, Uthangarai
-
21-Jan-2026
Trial
Judicial Magistrate, Uthangarai
-
11-Dec-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate, Uthangarai
-
10-Nov-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate, Uthangarai
-
25-Sep-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate, Uthangarai
-
24-Jul-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate, Uthangarai
-
14-May-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate, Uthangarai
-
04-Apr-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate, Uthangarai
-
03-Mar-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate, Uthangarai
-
23-Jan-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate, Uthangarai
-
25-Nov-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate, Uthangarai
-
24-Sep-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate, Uthangarai
-
09-Aug-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate, Uthangarai
-
19-Jul-2024
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate, Uthangarai
-
28-Jun-2024
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate, Uthangarai
-
27-May-2024
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate, Uthangarai
-
02-May-2024
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate, Uthangarai
-
18-Mar-2024
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate, Uthangarai
-
22-Feb-2024
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate, Uthangarai
-
22-Jan-2024
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate, Uthangarai
-
15-Dec-2023
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate, Uthangarai
-
16-Nov-2023
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate, Uthangarai
-
10-Oct-2023
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate, Uthangarai
-
04-Oct-2023
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate, Uthangarai
-
29-Aug-2023
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate, Uthangarai
-
19-Jul-2023
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate, Uthangarai
-
10-May-2023
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate, Uthangarai
-
28-Apr-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Apr-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 311/2023
Case Summary: S.I. of Police, Uthangarai P.S. v. Ammashi (311/2023) The court acquitted defendant Ammashi of charges under IPC sections 279 (rash driving) and 337 (causing hurt) in a motor vehicle collision case. The court found that while a road accident occurred on 08.09.2022 near Uthangarai, the key eyewitness (complainant Palaniswamy) gave contradictory testimony, initially claiming settlement with the accused, then recanting during cross-examination. The second eyewitness (Suguosh Kumar) similarly gave conflicting statements. Without reliable direct evidence linking the defendant to reckless driving causing injury, the court determined the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt and released the accused on bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts