S.I.of Police, Uthangarai P.S. vs Kumar — 14/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),323,324,427. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 27th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNKI120007752023
Filing Number
774/2023
Filing Date
15-Feb-2023
Registration No
14/2023
Registration Date
15-Feb-2023
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Uthangarai
Judge
1-Judicial Magistrate, Uthangarai
Decision Date
27-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 28-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
406
Police Station
UTHANGARAI POLICE STATION
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.S.I.of Police, Uthangarai P.S.
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Kumar
-
2.Ammashi
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
27-Mar-2026
Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF
Case Summary: S.I. of Police, Uthangarai P.S. v. Kumar and Ammashi (Case 14/2023) The court acquitted both defendants Kumar and Ammashi of charges under IPC sections 294(b), 323, 324, and 427 (criminal intimidation, voluntarily causing hurt, causing hurt by dangerous weapon, and mischief). The prosecution's case relied on three eyewitnesses who initially gave statements supporting the charge that the defendants assaulted a man demanding money, causing injuries and vehicle damage. However, all three witnesses later recanted in court, testifying they had reconciled with the defendants and were unwilling to pursue the case, rendering their testimony unreliable. Without credible corroborating testimony connecting the defendants to the alleged assault, the court found insufficient evidence to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt and ordered their acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate, Uthangarai
-
25-Mar-2026
Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF
-
25-Mar-2026
Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF
-
25-Mar-2026
Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF
-
25-Mar-2026
Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF
-
25-Mar-2026
Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF
-
25-Mar-2026
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate, Uthangarai
-
12-Mar-2026
Trial
Judicial Magistrate, Uthangarai
-
06-Feb-2026
Trial
Judicial Magistrate, Uthangarai
-
21-Jan-2026
Trial
Judicial Magistrate, Uthangarai
-
11-Dec-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate, Uthangarai
-
30-Sep-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate, Uthangarai
-
29-Jul-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate, Uthangarai
-
14-May-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate, Uthangarai
-
04-Apr-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate, Uthangarai
-
03-Mar-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate, Uthangarai
-
26-Feb-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate, Uthangarai
-
20-Jan-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate, Uthangarai
-
25-Nov-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate, Uthangarai
-
24-Sep-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate, Uthangarai
-
07-Aug-2024
Trial
Judicial Magistrate, Uthangarai
-
19-Jul-2024
Part Heard
Judicial Magistrate, Uthangarai
-
28-Jun-2024
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate, Uthangarai
-
21-May-2024
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate, Uthangarai
-
02-Apr-2024
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate, Uthangarai
-
13-Mar-2024
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate, Uthangarai
-
21-Feb-2024
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate, Uthangarai
-
19-Jan-2024
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate, Uthangarai
-
14-Dec-2023
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate, Uthangarai
-
15-Nov-2023
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate, Uthangarai
-
10-Oct-2023
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate, Uthangarai
-
04-Sep-2023
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate, Uthangarai
-
27-Jul-2023
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate, Uthangarai
-
12-Jul-2023
Framing of Charges
Judicial Magistrate, Uthangarai
-
09-May-2023
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate, Uthangarai
-
21-Mar-2023
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate, Uthangarai
-
15-Feb-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Feb-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 14/2023
Case Summary: S.I. of Police, Uthangarai P.S. v. Kumar and Ammashi (Case 14/2023) The court acquitted both defendants Kumar and Ammashi of charges under IPC sections 294(b), 323, 324, and 427 (criminal intimidation, voluntarily causing hurt, causing hurt by dangerous weapon, and mischief). The prosecution's case relied on three eyewitnesses who initially gave statements supporting the charge that the defendants assaulted a man demanding money, causing injuries and vehicle damage. However, all three witnesses later recanted in court, testifying they had reconciled with the defendants and were unwilling to pursue the case, rendering their testimony unreliable. Without credible corroborating testimony connecting the defendants to the alleged assault, the court found insufficient evidence to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt and ordered their acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts