S.I.of Police, Uthangarai P.S. vs Kumar — 14/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),323,324,427. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 27th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNKI120007752023
Filing Number
774/2023
Filing Date
15-02-2023
Registration No
14/2023
Registration Date
15-02-2023
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Uthangarai
Judge
1-Judicial Magistrate, Uthangarai
Decision Date
27th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
406
Police Station
UTHANGARAI POLICE STATION
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
S.I.of Police, Uthangarai P.S.
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Kumar
Ammashi
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial Magistrate, Uthangarai
Disposed
Questioning
Trial
Trial
Trial
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 25-03-2026 | Questioning |
| 12-03-2026 | Trial |
| 06-02-2026 | Trial |
| 21-01-2026 | Trial |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: S.I. of Police, Uthangarai P.S. v. Kumar and Ammashi (Case 14/2023) The court acquitted both defendants Kumar and Ammashi of charges under IPC sections 294(b), 323, 324, and 427 (criminal intimidation, voluntarily causing hurt, causing hurt by dangerous weapon, and mischief). The prosecution's case relied on three eyewitnesses who initially gave statements supporting the charge that the defendants assaulted a man demanding money, causing injuries and vehicle damage. However, all three witnesses later recanted in court, testifying they had reconciled with the defendants and were unwilling to pursue the case, rendering their testimony unreliable. Without credible corroborating testimony connecting the defendants to the alleged assault, the court found insufficient evidence to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt and ordered their acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: S.I. of Police, Uthangarai P.S. v. Kumar and Ammashi (Case 14/2023) The court acquitted both defendants Kumar and Ammashi of charges under IPC sections 294(b), 323, 324, and 427 (criminal intimidation, voluntarily causing hurt, causing hurt by dangerous weapon, and mischief). The prosecution's case relied on three eyewitnesses who initially gave statements supporting the charge that the defendants assaulted a man demanding money, causing injuries and vehicle damage. However, all three witnesses later recanted in court, testifying they had reconciled with the defendants and were unwilling to pursue the case, rendering their testimony unreliable. Without credible corroborating testimony connecting the defendants to the alleged assault, the court found insufficient evidence to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt and ordered their acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts