Sasikala vs Sivanesan — 110/2022

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Status: Orders. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.

Orders Next hearing 05-Jun-2026 this date has passed

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNKI110009912022

Filing Number

951/2022

Filing Date

22-Nov-2022

Registration No

110/2022

Registration Date

22-Nov-2022

Court

Sub Court, Uthangarai

Judge

2-Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sasikala

    Adv. RAJIV GANDHI P

  2. 2.Aravindhan

  3. 3.Kesavan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sivanesan

Case History

  1. 05-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Apr-2026

    Orders

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Reopen

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    Reopen

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Reopen

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  7. 27-Feb-2026

    Reopen

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  8. 18-Feb-2026

    Orders

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  9. 05-Feb-2026

    Orders

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  10. 22-Jan-2026

    Reopen

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  11. 03-Jan-2026

    Reopen

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  12. 09-Dec-2025

    Reopen

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  13. 26-Nov-2025

    Orders

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  14. 12-Nov-2025

    Orders

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  15. 29-Oct-2025

    Reopen

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  16. 10-Oct-2025

    Orders

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  17. 16-Sep-2025

    Reopen

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  18. 12-Sep-2025

    Reopen

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  19. 22-Aug-2025

    Orders

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  20. 31-Jul-2025

    Orders

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  21. 08-Jul-2025

    Reopen

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  22. 10-Jun-2025

    Reopen

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  23. 22-Apr-2025

    Reopen

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  24. 08-Apr-2025

    Orders

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  25. 18-Mar-2025

    Reopen

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  26. 18-Feb-2025

    Reopen

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  27. 09-Jan-2025

    Reopen

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  28. 12-Dec-2024

    Reopen

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  29. 21-Nov-2024

    Reopen

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  30. 07-Nov-2024

    Orders

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  31. 28-Oct-2024

    Orders

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  32. 19-Oct-2024

    Orders

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  33. 20-Sep-2024

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  34. 09-Sep-2024

    Orders

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  35. 29-Aug-2024

    Orders

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  36. 12-Aug-2024

    Orders

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  37. 25-Jul-2024

    Orders

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  38. 15-Jul-2024

    Orders

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  39. 01-Jul-2024

    Orders

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  40. 20-Jun-2024

    Orders

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  41. 12-Jun-2024

    Orders

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  42. 18-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  43. 04-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  44. 12-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  45. 29-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  46. 20-Feb-2024

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

    Case 110/2022 Summary: In this matter under The Oaths Act 1969 decided on 20.02.2024 by Subordinate Judge Tr. Senthil Kumar Rajavel, the court examined affidavits and documents filed by the petitioners Sasikala, Aravindhan, and Kesavan against respondent Sivanesan. The court found merit in the petitioners' contentions regarding the matters raised and accordingly directed that documents from Sections 1-16 be placed on record for proper consideration. The case was disposed of with the judge's orders recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  47. 20-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  48. 11-Jan-2024

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  49. 30-Nov-2023

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  50. 04-Nov-2023

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  51. 19-Oct-2023

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  52. 05-Oct-2023

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  53. 31-Jul-2023

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  54. 19-Jun-2023

    Appearance

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  55. 21-Apr-2023

    Appearance

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  56. 23-Mar-2023

    Appearance

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  57. 02-Mar-2023

    Appearance

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  58. 30-Jan-2023

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  59. 22-Nov-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  60. 22-Nov-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 110/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case 110/2022 Summary: In this matter under The Oaths Act 1969 decided on 20.02.2024 by Subordinate Judge Tr. Senthil Kumar Rajavel, the court examined affidavits and documents filed by the petitioners Sasikala, Aravindhan, and Kesavan against respondent Sivanesan. The court found merit in the petitioners' contentions regarding the matters raised and accordingly directed that documents from Sections 1-16 be placed on record for proper consideration. The case was disposed of with the judge's orders recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case