Poovarasan vs Sandhya Advocate - M.Pachiyappan — 89/2024
Case under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Section 13 ( i-a). Disposed: Uncontested--Dismissed on 12th March 2026.
OP - Original Petition
CNR: TNKI110006302024
Filing Number
522/2024
Filing Date
16-Jul-2024
Registration No
89/2024
Registration Date
18-Jul-2024
Court
Sub Court, Uthangarai
Judge
2-Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Dismissed
Last updated 28-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Poovarasan
Adv. LAKSHMANAN.E
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sandhya Advocate - M.Pachiyappan
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF
The Subordinate Court at Uthangarai dismissed petition OP.No.89/2024 filed by Poovarasan against Sandhya Advocate on 12.03.2026 for default, as the petitioner failed to appear despite being given sufficient time. No costs were imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
17-Feb-2026
Ex-Parte Evidence
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
20-Jan-2026
Ex-Parte Evidence
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
20-Nov-2025
Ex-Parte Evidence
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
23-Oct-2025
Counter
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
16-Sep-2025
Counter
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
12-Aug-2025
Counter
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
08-Jul-2025
Counter
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
10-Jun-2025
Counter
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
01-Apr-2025
Counter
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
20-Feb-2025
Counter
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
19-Dec-2024
Counter
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
11-Nov-2024
Counter
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
26-Sep-2024
Counter
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
13-Sep-2024
Issue of Service
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
18-Jul-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Jul-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 89/2024
The Subordinate Court at Uthangarai dismissed petition OP.No.89/2024 filed by Poovarasan against Sandhya Advocate on 12.03.2026 for default, as the petitioner failed to appear despite being given sufficient time. No costs were imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts