Chitibabu vs Govindhan (a) Govinda govinder — 138/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7, R 1-6. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 29-Jun-2026

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNKI110006022024

Filing Number

496/2024

Filing Date

03-Jul-2024

Registration No

138/2024

Registration Date

03-Jul-2024

Court

Sub Court, Uthangarai

Judge

2-Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O7, R 1-6

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Chitibabu

    Adv. Balaji kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Govindhan (a) Govinda govinder

Case History

  1. 29-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Jun-2026

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  3. 18-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  7. 28-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  8. 15-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  9. 26-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  10. 14-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  11. 25-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  12. 26-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  13. 19-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  14. 12-Sep-2025

    Judgement

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  15. 02-Sep-2025

    Judgement

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  16. 29-Aug-2025

    Judgement

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  17. 26-Aug-2025

    Judgement

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  18. 06-Aug-2025

    Judgement

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  19. 30-Jul-2025

    Judgement

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  20. 29-Jul-2025

    Judgement

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  21. 16-Jul-2025

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

    This document records the deposition of PW.2 (a 48-year-old witness) in Original Suit No. 138/2024 before the Subordinate Court, Uthangarai on July 16, 2025. The witness affirmed his statement in accordance with the Indian Evidence Act, 1873, confirming that the facts stated in his examination-in-chief were true and correctly recorded. No cross-examination was conducted. This is a procedural court document recording witness testimony, not a final judgment or order on the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  22. 16-Jul-2025

    Judgement

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  23. 18-Jun-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  24. 02-Jun-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  25. 28-Mar-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  26. 10-Mar-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  27. 27-Feb-2025

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  28. 27-Feb-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  29. 31-Jan-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  30. 10-Jan-2025

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  31. 12-Dec-2024

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  32. 08-Nov-2024

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  33. 14-Sep-2024

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  34. 05-Aug-2024

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  35. 03-Jul-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  36. 03-Jul-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 138/2024

casestatus.in Summary

This document records the deposition of PW.2 (a 48-year-old witness) in Original Suit No. 138/2024 before the Subordinate Court, Uthangarai on July 16, 2025. The witness affirmed his statement in accordance with the Indian Evidence Act, 1873, confirming that the facts stated in his examination-in-chief were true and correctly recorded. No cross-examination was conducted. This is a procedural court document recording witness testimony, not a final judgment or order on the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case