Lakshmi vs Kannan Transports Company, Dharmapuri — 69/2021

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Status: Orders. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.

Orders Next hearing 22-Jun-2026

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNKI110005412021

Filing Number

519/2021

Filing Date

22-Nov-2021

Registration No

69/2021

Registration Date

22-Nov-2021

Court

Sub Court, Uthangarai

Judge

2-Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Lakshmi

    Adv. MANICKA PRABU.S.R

  2. 2.Vanitha

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kannan Transports Company, Dharmapuri

  2. 2.The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., Vellore

Case History

  1. 22-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Orders

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  3. 29-Apr-2026

    Reopen

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  4. 22-Apr-2026

    Orders

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  5. 18-Apr-2026

    Orders

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  6. 09-Apr-2026

    Orders

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  7. 07-Apr-2026

    Orders

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  8. 18-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  9. 06-Mar-2026

    Reopen

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  10. 24-Feb-2026

    Reopen

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  11. 17-Feb-2026

    Orders

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  12. 04-Feb-2026

    Orders

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  13. 23-Jan-2026

    Reopen

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  14. 06-Jan-2026

    Reopen

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  15. 09-Dec-2025

    Reopen

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  16. 24-Nov-2025

    Orders

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  17. 13-Nov-2025

    Orders

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  18. 30-Oct-2025

    Orders

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  19. 24-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  20. 09-Sep-2025

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

    This document is a witness deposition (RW.1) in MCOP Case 69/2021 before the Subordinate Court, Uthangarai. The respondent's witness, M. Ravi (age 36), testified regarding transport vehicle authorization permits for vehicle TN 29 BM 2277 operating between Dharmapuri and Kethanthapatti. The witness confirmed valid permits existed for 2016-2021 and 2021-2026 periods. Under cross-examination, the witness stated the vehicle operated on 24.01.2021 without proper office authorization, which is the key dispute in this case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  21. 09-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  22. 05-Aug-2025

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  23. 03-Jul-2025

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  24. 03-Jul-2025

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  25. 10-Jun-2025

    Issue of Service

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  26. 15-Apr-2025

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  27. 15-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  28. 03-Apr-2025

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  29. 03-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  30. 18-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  31. 04-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  32. 28-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  33. 03-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  34. 19-Nov-2024

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  35. 19-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  36. 29-Oct-2024

    Appearance

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  37. 14-Oct-2024

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  38. 14-Oct-2024

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  39. 18-Sep-2024

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  40. 01-Aug-2024

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  41. 04-Jul-2024

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  42. 18-Apr-2024

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  43. 09-Mar-2024

    Lok Adalat

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  44. 20-Feb-2024

    Lok Adalat

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  45. 30-Jan-2024

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  46. 09-Jan-2024

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  47. 07-Nov-2023

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  48. 21-Sep-2023

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  49. 24-Aug-2023

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  50. 27-Jun-2023

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  51. 06-Apr-2023

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  52. 16-Feb-2023

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  53. 10-Jan-2023

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  54. 18-Oct-2022

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  55. 13-Sep-2022

    Enquiry

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  56. 18-Aug-2022

    Publication

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  57. 28-Jul-2022

    Publication

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  58. 21-Jul-2022

    Publication

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  59. 16-Jun-2022

    Publication

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  60. 31-Mar-2022

    Steps

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  61. 01-Mar-2022

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  62. 25-Jan-2022

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  63. 23-Dec-2021

    Counter

    Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

  64. 22-Nov-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  65. 22-Nov-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 69/2021

casestatus.in Summary

This document is a witness deposition (RW.1) in MCOP Case 69/2021 before the Subordinate Court, Uthangarai. The respondent's witness, M. Ravi (age 36), testified regarding transport vehicle authorization permits for vehicle TN 29 BM 2277 operating between Dharmapuri and Kethanthapatti. The witness confirmed valid permits existed for 2016-2021 and 2021-2026 periods. Under cross-examination, the witness stated the vehicle operated on 24.01.2021 without proper office authorization, which is the key dispute in this case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case