Sathieshkumar vs Arunkumar — 31/2023

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Status: Enquiry. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNKI110003072023

Enquiry

Next Hearing

16th June 2026

Filing Number

299/2023

Filing Date

28-04-2023

Registration No

31/2023

Registration Date

28-04-2023

Court

Sub Court, Uthangarai

Judge

2-Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

Acts & Sections

MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 166

Petitioner(s)

Sathieshkumar

Adv. SELVAKUMARAN.R

Respondent(s)

Arunkumar

Tata AIG General Insurance Co Ltd.

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai

16-04-2026

Enquiry

12-03-2026

Enquiry

03-02-2026

Enquiry

09-12-2025

Enquiry

11-11-2025

Enquiry

Interim Orders

11-11-2025
Copy of Oral Evidence/Deposition

This document records the deposition of witness PW.1 (Sathieshkumar, age 22) in case MCOP.No. 31/2023 before the Subordinate Court, Uthangarai on 11 November 2025. The witness testified for the petitioner regarding a motor vehicle accident and submitted 15 documentary exhibits including FIR, accident report, insurance certificate, driving license, and medical records. During cross-examination, the witness's claims regarding vehicle ownership, insurance coverage, injuries, and compensation were extensively challenged by the opposing counsel, with the court recording denials and contradictions to various assertions made in his affidavit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This document records the deposition of witness PW.1 (Sathieshkumar, age 22) in case MCOP.No. 31/2023 before the Subordinate Court, Uthangarai on 11 November 2025. The witness testified for the petitioner regarding a motor vehicle accident and submitted 15 documentary exhibits including FIR, accident report, insurance certificate, driving license, and medical records. During cross-examination, the witness's claims regarding vehicle ownership, insurance coverage, injuries, and compensation were extensively challenged by the opposing counsel, with the court recording denials and contradictions to various assertions made in his affidavit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Uthangarai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case