K.G.Poongothai vs Mangai — 56/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Or7R1to6. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 06th July 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNKI110001562020
Filing Number
154/2020
Filing Date
05-Mar-2020
Registration No
56/2020
Registration Date
05-Mar-2020
Court
Sub Court, Uthangarai
Judge
2-Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.K.G.Poongothai
Adv. S.Sasikumar
Respondent(s)
-
1.Mangai
-
2.Muniyammal
-
3.Mari
Case History
-
06-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
12-Jun-2026
Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF
Case Summary: OS.No. 56/2020 In this case dated 12.06.2026, witness K.G. Poongothai (petitioner) testified regarding a property agreement allegedly executed on 10.10.2017 between the parties. The court examined evidence including documents numbered 604 and 372, and heard cross-examination regarding the agreement's terms, stamp duty payment, and the respondents' (Mangai, Muniyammal, and Mari) involvement. The court found issues with the respondents' documentary evidence and noted that the third respondent allegedly received the full property benefit. The cross-examination proceedings were adjourned pending further submissions from the respondents regarding the original agreement documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Jun-2026
Evidence
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
17-Apr-2026
Evidence
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
18-Mar-2026
Evidence
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
04-Mar-2026
Evidence
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
16-Feb-2026
Lok Adalat
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
04-Feb-2026
Evidence
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
07-Jan-2026
Evidence
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
08-Dec-2025
Trial
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
24-Nov-2025
Trial
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
07-Nov-2025
Trial
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
17-Oct-2025
Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF
-
17-Oct-2025
Trial
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
19-Sep-2025
Trial
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
03-Sep-2025
Trial
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
08-Aug-2025
Trial
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
02-Aug-2025
Trial
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
28-Jul-2025
Issues
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
17-Jun-2025
Issues
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
17-Apr-2025
Issue of Service
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
17-Apr-2025
Restored
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
17-Apr-2025
Issue of Service
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
21-Nov-2024
Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF
-
29-Apr-2021
Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF
-
29-Apr-2021
Disposed
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
28-Apr-2021
Judgement
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
19-Apr-2021
Judgement
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
19-Mar-2021
Ex-Parte Evidence
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
02-Mar-2021
Written Statement
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
22-Feb-2021
Written Statement
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
10-Feb-2021
Written Statement
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
05-Jan-2021
Written Statement
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
20-Nov-2020
Written Statement
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
09-Oct-2020
Batta
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
25-Aug-2020
Batta
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
06-Jul-2020
Issue of Service
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
09-Jun-2020
Issue of Service
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
13-May-2020
Issue of Service
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
24-Apr-2020
Issue of Service
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
07-Apr-2020
Issue of Service
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
05-Mar-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Mar-2020
Case filed
Registration No. 56/2020
Case Summary: OS.No. 56/2020 In this case dated 12.06.2026, witness K.G. Poongothai (petitioner) testified regarding a property agreement allegedly executed on 10.10.2017 between the parties. The court examined evidence including documents numbered 604 and 372, and heard cross-examination regarding the agreement's terms, stamp duty payment, and the respondents' (Mangai, Muniyammal, and Mari) involvement. The court found issues with the respondents' documentary evidence and noted that the third respondent allegedly received the full property benefit. The cross-examination proceedings were adjourned pending further submissions from the respondents regarding the original agreement documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts