Meenatchi vs S.Naveenkumar — 52/2020
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Status: Enquiry. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNKI110001132020
Filing Number
111/2020
Filing Date
12-Feb-2020
Registration No
52/2020
Registration Date
12-Feb-2020
Court
Sub Court, Uthangarai
Judge
2-Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
Last updated 28-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Meenatchi
Adv. R.Selvakumaran
Respondent(s)
-
1.S.Naveenkumar
-
2.Royal Sundaram General Insurance Co. Ltd.,
Case History
-
23-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
21-Apr-2026
Enquiry
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
12-Mar-2026
Enquiry
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
10-Feb-2026
Enquiry
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
06-Jan-2026
Enquiry
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
25-Nov-2025
Enquiry
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
30-Oct-2025
Enquiry
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
25-Sep-2025
Enquiry
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
02-Sep-2025
Enquiry
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
01-Aug-2025
Restored
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
01-Aug-2025
Issue of Service
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
01-Aug-2025
Enquiry
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
23-Jun-2022
Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF
Case Summary: MCOP 52/2020 - Meenatchi v. S. Naveenkumar and Royal Sundaram General Insurance Co. Ltd. Outcome: Petition allowed. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded compensation of Rs. 35,000 to petitioner Meenatchi for simple injuries sustained in a motor accident on 30.10.2019. The tribunal held both respondents (vehicle owner and insurer) jointly and severally liable. Insurance company directed to deposit amount in tribunal's bank account within two months, with 7.5% annual interest from petition filing date (12.02.2020). Petitioner entitled to Rs. 2,080 proportionate costs and refund of excess court fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Jun-2022
Disposed
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
14-Jun-2022
Orders
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
07-Jun-2022
Orders
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
28-Apr-2022
Arguments
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
21-Apr-2022
Arguments
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
17-Mar-2022
Ex-Parte Evidence
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
03-Mar-2022
Ex-Parte Evidence
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
01-Feb-2022
Ex-Parte Evidence
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
04-Jan-2022
Ex-Parte Evidence
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
18-Nov-2021
Ex-Parte Evidence
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
21-Oct-2021
Counter
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
09-Sep-2021
Counter
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
03-Aug-2021
Counter
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
06-Jul-2021
Counter
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
22-Apr-2021
Counter
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
23-Mar-2021
Counter
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
18-Feb-2021
Counter
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
19-Jan-2021
Counter
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
15-Dec-2020
Counter
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
26-Nov-2020
Counter
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
15-Oct-2020
Batta
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
27-Aug-2020
Appearance
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
07-Jul-2020
Issue of Service
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
05-Jun-2020
Issue of Service
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
08-May-2020
Issue of Service
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
21-Apr-2020
Issue of Service
Subordinate Judge, Uthangarai
-
12-Feb-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Feb-2020
Case filed
Registration No. 52/2020
Case Summary: MCOP 52/2020 - Meenatchi v. S. Naveenkumar and Royal Sundaram General Insurance Co. Ltd. Outcome: Petition allowed. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded compensation of Rs. 35,000 to petitioner Meenatchi for simple injuries sustained in a motor accident on 30.10.2019. The tribunal held both respondents (vehicle owner and insurer) jointly and severally liable. Insurance company directed to deposit amount in tribunal's bank account within two months, with 7.5% annual interest from petition filing date (12.02.2020). Petitioner entitled to Rs. 2,080 proportionate costs and refund of excess court fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts