M/s. Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Services Limited, Represented by Deputy Manager, P.Suresh vs Murugesh.T — 98/2023
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138r/w142. Disposed: Contested--Conviction on 12th March 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNKI100006192023
Filing Number
619/2023
Filing Date
20-03-2023
Registration No
98/2023
Registration Date
20-03-2023
Court
Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level, Hosur
Judge
5-Judicial Magistrate(Fast Track Court), Hosur
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Conviction
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M/s. Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Services Limited, Represented by Deputy Manager, P.Suresh
Adv. ANITHA K
Respondent(s)
Murugesh.T
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Judicial Magistrate(Fast Track Court), Hosur
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Judgement
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 05-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 26-02-2026 | Judgement |
| 23-02-2026 | Judgement |
| 16-02-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 98/2023 The Hosur Criminal Court convicted Murugesh.T under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonoring a cheque. Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Services had loaned ₹3,00,000 for a vehicle to the respondent with repayment terms of ₹4,30,918 in 23 monthly installments. After receiving only partial payments and a cheque for ₹2,80,000 that was returned with "Funds Insufficient," the company sent a legal notice on December 22, 2022, which the respondent refused to acknowledge. The court found the respondent guilty and sentenced him to 6 months imprisonment plus ₹5,60,000 compensation, rejecting his defense that he had paid all installments without documentary evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary of Case 98/2023 The Hosur Criminal Court convicted Murugesh.T under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonoring a cheque. Mahindra and Mahindra Financial Services had loaned ₹3,00,000 for a vehicle to the respondent with repayment terms of ₹4,30,918 in 23 monthly installments. After receiving only partial payments and a cheque for ₹2,80,000 that was returned with "Funds Insufficient," the company sent a legal notice on December 22, 2022, which the respondent refused to acknowledge. The court found the respondent guilty and sentenced him to 6 months imprisonment plus ₹5,60,000 compensation, rejecting his defense that he had paid all installments without documentary evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts