Senthil Kumar vs Asokan — 500216/2017

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 12th March 2026.

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNKI100001742017

Case disposed

Filing Number

500216/2017

Filing Date

07-11-2017

Registration No

500216/2017

Registration Date

07-11-2017

Court

Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level, Hosur

Judge

5-Judicial Magistrate(Fast Track Court), Hosur

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142
Mp/1/2024 Classification : 256 Cr.pc Section Senthil KumarAsokan
Mp/2/2024 Classification : 256 Cr.pc Section Senthil KumarAsokan

Petitioner(s)

Senthil Kumar

Respondent(s)

Asokan

Hearing History

Judge: 5-Judicial Magistrate(Fast Track Court), Hosur

12-03-2026

Disposed

16-02-2026

Mediation

29-01-2026

Mediation

20-01-2026

Evidence

12-01-2026

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Copy of Judgment/Order

Case Summary: STC No. 216-2017 Court Decision: The court dismissed the complaint against Asokan. The petitioner Senthil Kumar alleged that Asokan received a cheque for ₹16.50 lakh as security, which bounced with "Funds Insufficient" and failed to repay the loan. However, the court found no criminal liability under the Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138, as Asokan denied receiving the money and claimed Senthil retained the cheque as collateral. The court concluded there was insufficient evidence of criminal wrongdoing and ordered Asokan's acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: STC No. 216-2017 Court Decision: The court dismissed the complaint against Asokan. The petitioner Senthil Kumar alleged that Asokan received a cheque for ₹16.50 lakh as security, which bounced with "Funds Insufficient" and failed to repay the loan. However, the court found no criminal liability under the Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138, as Asokan denied receiving the money and claimed Senthil retained the cheque as collateral. The court concluded there was insufficient evidence of criminal wrongdoing and ordered Asokan's acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level, Hosur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case