The Sub Inspector of Police vs Raja — 500033/2016
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,324,506(ii),435. Status: Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNKI100000882016
Next Hearing
08th June 2026
Filing Number
500033/2016
Filing Date
29-09-2010
Registration No
500033/2016
Registration Date
29-09-2010
Court
Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level, Hosur
Judge
5-Judicial Magistrate(Fast Track Court), Hosur
FIR Details
FIR Number
74
Police Station
SIPCOT POLICE STATION
Year
2009
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The Sub Inspector of Police
Respondent(s)
Raja
Apsal
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Judicial Magistrate(Fast Track Court), Hosur
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-05-2026 | Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant |
| 30-04-2026 | Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant |
| 09-04-2026 | Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant |
| 12-03-2026 | Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant |
| 19-02-2026 | Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 500033/2016 Outcome: Bail modification petition allowed. The court relaxed the bail conditions originally imposed in Cr.M.P. No. 653/2024, permitting accused Raja to execute his own bond for Rs. 5,000 instead of requiring two sureties. The court found that after 56 days in judicial custody, Raja was unable to provide sureties due to poor family circumstances and lack of accommodation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 500033/2016 Outcome: Bail modification petition allowed. The court relaxed the bail conditions originally imposed in Cr.M.P. No. 653/2024, permitting accused Raja to execute his own bond for Rs. 5,000 instead of requiring two sureties. The court found that after 56 days in judicial custody, Raja was unable to provide sureties due to poor family circumstances and lack of accommodation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts