N.R.Chandrasekar vs Prathima Rao — 295/2022
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 190(1)and142. Status: Mediation. Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNKI100000582020
Next Hearing
02nd July 2026
Filing Number
58/2020
Filing Date
06-02-2020
Registration No
295/2022
Registration Date
12-12-2022
Court
Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level, Hosur
Judge
5-Judicial Magistrate(Fast Track Court), Hosur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
N.R.Chandrasekar
Adv. R.Balakrishna
Respondent(s)
Prathima Rao
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Judicial Magistrate(Fast Track Court), Hosur
Mediation
Mediation
Mediation
Mediation
Mediation
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-05-2026 | Mediation |
| 16-04-2026 | Mediation |
| 12-03-2026 | Mediation |
| 16-02-2026 | Mediation |
| 22-01-2026 | Mediation |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 295/2022 Court: Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court, Hosur Parties: N.R. Chandrasekar (Petitioner/PW1) v. Prathima Rao (Respondent) Outcome: Cross-examination of PW1 (N.R. Chandrasekar) was conducted on October 21, 2024, and adjourned. The witness testified regarding a loan of ₹9,00,000 advanced to the respondent in March 2018 for educational purposes, an alleged additional loan of ₹15,00,000, a property agreement dated December 29, 2016, and related financial transactions. Cross-examination by the respondent's counsel remains incomplete and has been postponed for continuation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 295/2022 Court: Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court, Hosur Parties: N.R. Chandrasekar (Petitioner/PW1) v. Prathima Rao (Respondent) Outcome: Cross-examination of PW1 (N.R. Chandrasekar) was conducted on October 21, 2024, and adjourned. The witness testified regarding a loan of ₹9,00,000 advanced to the respondent in March 2018 for educational purposes, an alleged additional loan of ₹15,00,000, a property agreement dated December 29, 2016, and related financial transactions. Cross-examination by the respondent's counsel remains incomplete and has been postponed for continuation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts