State Government, Pochampalli PS vs ARUNKUMAR — 725/2024

Case under Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1)(C). Status: Trial. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.

Trial Next hearing 25-Jun-2026

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNKI070028112024

e-Filing Number

08-10-2024

Filing Number

2685/2024

Filing Date

10-Oct-2024

Registration No

725/2024

Registration Date

10-Oct-2024

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Pochampalli

Judge

1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli

Last updated 28-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

301

Police Station

POCHAMPALLI POLICE STATION

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1)(C)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government, Pochampalli PS (Police Station)

    Adv. Inspector of Police Pochampalli PS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ARUNKUMAR

Case History

  1. 25-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 26-May-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli

  3. 12-May-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli

  7. 05-Mar-2026

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: STC.725/2024 This is a witness deposition (PW1) in a liquor trafficking case against respondent Arunkumar. On 29.09.2024, police recovered five bottles of Express brandy (180 ML each) from an AK restaurant near Pochampalli-Tiruppattur road after the accused admitted to selling them. The witness, a police constable, testified about the seizure memo (marked A.SA.A.1) and destruction memo (marked A.SA.A.2), both signed by him. FIR 301/2024 was registered at 09:00 AM. During cross-examination, the accused's counsel challenged procedural details, including timeline discrepancies and absence of independent witnesses, but the witness maintained consistency in his account. The case proceeded with evidence being recorded in open court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  8. 05-Mar-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli

  9. 26-Feb-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli

  10. 22-Jan-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli

  11. 30-Dec-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli

  12. 18-Dec-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli

  13. 11-Dec-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli

  14. 09-Dec-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli

  15. 25-Nov-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli

  16. 23-Sep-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli

  17. 09-Sep-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli

  18. 22-Jul-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli

  19. 14-May-2025

    For further Proceedings

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli

  20. 20-Feb-2025

    For further Proceedings

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli

  21. 10-Dec-2024

    For further Proceedings

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli

  22. 09-Dec-2024

    Appearance

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli

  23. 10-Oct-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  24. 10-Oct-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 725/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: STC.725/2024 This is a witness deposition (PW1) in a liquor trafficking case against respondent Arunkumar. On 29.09.2024, police recovered five bottles of Express brandy (180 ML each) from an AK restaurant near Pochampalli-Tiruppattur road after the accused admitted to selling them. The witness, a police constable, testified about the seizure memo (marked A.SA.A.1) and destruction memo (marked A.SA.A.2), both signed by him. FIR 301/2024 was registered at 09:00 AM. During cross-examination, the accused's counsel challenged procedural details, including timeline discrepancies and absence of independent witnesses, but the witness maintained consistency in his account. The case proceeded with evidence being recorded in open court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case