Devagi W/o. Murugan, Phichanur Village vs Subramani S/o. Veeragoundar, Chinnakoothampatti Village — 57/2025

Case Summary: O.S. No. 57/2025 Outcome: The interlocutory application for temporary injunction is dismissed. Key Facts: Devagi sought to restrain defendants from interfering with her possession of a suit property inherited from her father (1984). She claimed defendants unlawfully obstructed her construction after allegedly vacating in 2019. Defendants countered that a 2007 sale agreement gave them continuous possession, supported by tax receipts and construction activities. Court's Reasoning: The court found the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case for injunction. While title was not seriously disputed, actual physical possession was heavily contested with both parties claiming possession based on rival documents. The court held that possession—critical for immovable property injunctions—could not be conclusively determined at the interlocutory stage and requires full trial evidence. Balance of convenience also favored defendants, and irreparable injury was unsubstantiated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.