Mariappan vs Govindasamy Advocate - SARAVANAN.N — 33/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Or7R1to6. Status: Part Heard. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNKI070012552021
Filing Number
49/2021
Filing Date
08-Apr-2021
Registration No
33/2021
Registration Date
08-Apr-2021
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Pochampalli
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
Last updated 28-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Mariappan
Adv. JAYABALAN.M
Respondent(s)
-
1.Govindasamy Advocate - SARAVANAN.N
-
2.Palani
Adv. SARAVANAN.N
-
3.Poongodi
Adv. SARAVANAN.N
-
4.Praveenkumar
Adv. SARAVANAN.N
-
5.The Sub Registrar, Pochampalli
Adv. ASSISTANT PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
-
6.The District collector, Krishnagiri
Adv. ASSISTANT PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Case History
-
10-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
30-Apr-2026
Part Heard
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
12-Mar-2026
Part Heard
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
19-Feb-2026
IA Pending
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
12-Feb-2026
IA Pending
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
29-Jan-2026
IA Pending
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
27-Jan-2026
IA Pending
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
12-Dec-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
13-Nov-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
13-Oct-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
26-Aug-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
17-Jul-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
25-Jun-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
07-Apr-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
12-Feb-2025
IA Pending
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
04-Dec-2024
IA Pending
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
13-Nov-2024
IA Pending
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
30-Sep-2024
IA Pending
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
28-Aug-2024
Arguments
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
05-Aug-2024
Arguments
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
21-Jun-2024
Arguments
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
18-Apr-2024
Arguments
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
25-Mar-2024
Arguments
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
13-Mar-2024
Arguments
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
27-Feb-2024
Arguments
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
16-Feb-2024
Arguments
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
05-Feb-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
10-Jan-2024
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
20-Dec-2023
Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF
Case Summary: OS.33/2021 Petitioner Mariappan filed a civil suit against respondents Palani, Poongodi, and Govindasamy Advocate Saravanan regarding a disputed property transaction. The court examined evidence and cross-examined witnesses, including the petitioner's claims that the respondents wrongfully prevented him from selling jointly-owned land. The court rejected the petitioner's relief sought, holding that his requested remedies were not sustainable and dismissing the suit accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Dec-2023
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
11-Dec-2023
Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF
-
11-Dec-2023
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
24-Nov-2023
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
08-Nov-2023
Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF
-
08-Nov-2023
Appearance
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
18-Oct-2023
Appearance
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
04-Oct-2023
Appearance
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
15-Sep-2023
Part Heard
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
23-Aug-2023
Part Heard
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
09-Aug-2023
Part Heard
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
19-Jul-2023
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
03-Jun-2023
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
06-Apr-2023
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
04-Mar-2023
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
08-Feb-2023
Written Statement
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
12-Dec-2022
Written Statement
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
07-Nov-2022
Written Statement
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
10-Oct-2022
Written Statement
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
16-Sep-2022
Written Statement
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
11-Aug-2022
Written Statement
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
05-Aug-2022
Written Statement
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
15-Jun-2022
Written Statement
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
05-Mar-2022
Written Statement
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
09-Dec-2021
Written Statement
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
26-Oct-2021
Written Statement
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
01-Sep-2021
Written Statement
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
12-Jul-2021
Issue of Service
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
01-Jun-2021
Issue of Service
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
08-Apr-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Apr-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 33/2021
Case Summary: OS.33/2021 Petitioner Mariappan filed a civil suit against respondents Palani, Poongodi, and Govindasamy Advocate Saravanan regarding a disputed property transaction. The court examined evidence and cross-examined witnesses, including the petitioner's claims that the respondents wrongfully prevented him from selling jointly-owned land. The court rejected the petitioner's relief sought, holding that his requested remedies were not sustainable and dismissing the suit accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts