Govindharaj vs V.Sakthivel Advocate - CHANDRAN.A — 12/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1and6. Status: Trial. Next hearing: 07th July 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNKI070006292019
Filing Number
22/2019
Filing Date
08-Feb-2019
Registration No
12/2019
Registration Date
08-Feb-2019
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Pochampalli
Judge
1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Govindharaj
Adv. JAYABALAN.M
-
2.Sakthivel
Adv. JAYABALAN.M
-
3.Srinivasan
Adv. JAYABALAN.M
Respondent(s)
-
1.V.Sakthivel Advocate - CHANDRAN.A
-
2.Velayutham
Adv. KESAVAN.G
Case History
-
07-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
08-Jun-2026
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
16-Apr-2026
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
18-Mar-2026
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
27-Jan-2026
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
19-Dec-2025
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
14-Nov-2025
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
17-Oct-2025
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
10-Sep-2025
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
10-Sep-2025
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
18-Aug-2025
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
28-Jul-2025
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
20-Jun-2025
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
14-Jun-2025
Mediation
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
12-Jun-2025
Lok Adalat
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
16-Apr-2025
Mediation
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
19-Mar-2025
Mediation
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
21-Feb-2025
Mediation
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
01-Feb-2025
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
06-Jan-2025
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
04-Dec-2024
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
13-Nov-2024
Reopen
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
13-Nov-2024
Restored
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
13-Nov-2024
Reopen
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
06-Mar-2021
Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF
-
06-Mar-2021
Copy of Decree/Decretal OrderView PDF
Case 12/2019 Summary In this Tamil Nadu civil case decided on March 6, 2021, the court allowed the petitioners' (Govindharaj, Sakthivel, and Srinivasan) petition and set aside a 2009 administrative order that had restricted their rights over certain properties. The court imposed clear restrictions on the respondents, prohibiting them from interfering with the petitioners' legitimate rights and possession of the disputed properties. Additionally, the court ordered the respondents to pay ₹615 as costs to the petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Mar-2021
Disposed
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
25-Feb-2021
Judgement
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
16-Feb-2021
Judgement
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
05-Feb-2021
Judgement
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
29-Jan-2021
Judgement
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
08-Jan-2021
Judgement
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
08-Dec-2020
For further Proceedings
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
10-Nov-2020
For further Proceedings
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
15-Sep-2020
For further Proceedings
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
06-Aug-2020
For further Proceedings
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
21-Jul-2020
For further Proceedings
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
11-Jun-2020
For further Proceedings
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
08-May-2020
For further Proceedings
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
21-Apr-2020
For further Proceedings
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
24-Mar-2020
For further Proceedings
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
04-Mar-2020
For further Proceedings
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
19-Feb-2020
For further Proceedings
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
05-Feb-2020
For further Proceedings
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
28-Jan-2020
For further Proceedings
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
07-Jan-2020
Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF
-
07-Jan-2020
For further Proceedings
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
06-Dec-2019
Ex-Parte Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
25-Nov-2019
Ex-Parte Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
21-Oct-2019
Ex-Parte Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
27-Sep-2019
Ex-Parte Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
09-Sep-2019
Written Statement
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
21-Aug-2019
Written Statement
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
09-Aug-2019
Written Statement
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
10-Jul-2019
Written Statement
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
13-Jun-2019
Written Statement
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
08-Apr-2019
Written Statement
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
08-Mar-2019
Written Statement
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pochampalli
-
08-Feb-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Feb-2019
Case filed
Registration No. 12/2019
Case 12/2019 Summary In this Tamil Nadu civil case decided on March 6, 2021, the court allowed the petitioners' (Govindharaj, Sakthivel, and Srinivasan) petition and set aside a 2009 administrative order that had restricted their rights over certain properties. The court imposed clear restrictions on the respondents, prohibiting them from interfering with the petitioners' legitimate rights and possession of the disputed properties. Additionally, the court ordered the respondents to pay ₹615 as costs to the petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts