Inspector of police vs k.A.Gangadhar — 160/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 287, 304(A). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNKI060017032022

Evidence

Next Hearing

11th June 2026

Filing Number

1590/2022

Filing Date

29-07-2022

Registration No

160/2022

Registration Date

29-07-2022

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate No. I Court, Hosur

Judge

2-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate No.I, Hosur

FIR Details

FIR Number

28

Police Station

BAGALUR POLICE STATION

Year

2019

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 Section 287, 304(A)

Petitioner(s)

Inspector of police

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

k.A.Gangadhar

Hearing History

Judge: 2-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate No.I, Hosur

16-04-2026

Evidence

12-03-2026

Evidence

05-03-2026

Evidence

03-03-2026

Evidence

17-02-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

14-05-2024
Copy of Oral Evidence/Deposition

Case 160/2022 Summary: The court examined a criminal case involving the death of one individual (Harish Kumar, age 26) occurring on 18.02.2019. The respondent K.A. Gangadhar was charged under IPC sections 287, 304A (causing death by negligence), and 338. The court found that while the respondent's actions resulted in the victim's death, the evidence did not conclusively establish criminal negligence. The petition was dismissed, and the case proceeded through the normal judicial process with the respondent remaining subject to the criminal charges under the applicable sections. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 160/2022 Summary: The court examined a criminal case involving the death of one individual (Harish Kumar, age 26) occurring on 18.02.2019. The respondent K.A. Gangadhar was charged under IPC sections 287, 304A (causing death by negligence), and 338. The court found that while the respondent's actions resulted in the victim's death, the evidence did not conclusively establish criminal negligence. The petition was dismissed, and the case proceeded through the normal judicial process with the respondent remaining subject to the criminal charges under the applicable sections. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate No. I Court, Hosur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case