Inspector of police vs Ashok Kumar — 55/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,304(A). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 22nd May 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNKI060015802022
Filing Number
1470/2022
Filing Date
20-07-2022
Registration No
55/2022
Registration Date
20-07-2022
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate No. I Court, Hosur
Judge
2-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate No.I, Hosur
Decision Date
22nd May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
486
Police Station
BAGALUR POLICE STATION
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Inspector of police
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Ashok Kumar
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate No.I, Hosur
Disposed
Judgement
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 21-05-2026 | Judgement |
| 19-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 17-03-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Copy of Judgment/Order
Interim Orders
The court rejected the prosecution's charges against the accused (Ashok Kumar) in a vehicular death case. The investigation claimed a tractor backed into a JCB, causing it to reverse and strike a person to death, but the court found insufficient evidence of the accused's culpability, noting that witnesses were relatives of the deceased, no independent bystanders testified, and the vehicle examination revealed no defects. The court concluded the accused had not operated the vehicle during the incident and acquitted him due to lack of credible evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court rejected the prosecution's charges against the accused (Ashok Kumar) in a vehicular death case. The investigation claimed a tractor backed into a JCB, causing it to reverse and strike a person to death, but the court found insufficient evidence of the accused's culpability, noting that witnesses were relatives of the deceased, no independent bystanders testified, and the vehicle examination revealed no defects. The court concluded the accused had not operated the vehicle during the incident and acquitted him due to lack of credible evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts