Berigai P.S vs Annadurai — 200077/2014
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 379,511IPC. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 26th May 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNKI060002592014
Filing Number
200077/2014
Filing Date
15-05-2014
Registration No
200077/2014
Registration Date
15-05-2014
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate No. I Court, Hosur
Judge
2-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate No.I, Hosur
Decision Date
26th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Berigai P.S
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Annadurai
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate No.I, Hosur
Disposed
Judgement
Questioning
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 26-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 25-05-2026 | Judgement |
| 22-05-2026 | Questioning |
| 12-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 11-05-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Copy of Judgment/Order
Interim Orders
Case Summary: CC No. 77-2014, Berigai P.S. v. Annadurai The Ousoor Criminal Court examined witness testimony in a case involving an alleged altercation near an Anjaneya temple approximately ten years prior. The witness, a real estate businessman, testified that he signed a memo of facts prepared by police on the day of the incident. The court marked the witness's statement under Section 161 CrPC as hostile testimony upon the prosecution's request, noting contradictions with the witness's earlier police statement. Cross-examination of the hostile witness was conducted, and the witness confirmed the authenticity of his signature on the memo. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Copy of Oral Evidence/Deposition
Case Summary: CC No. 77-2014, Berigai P.S. v. Annadurai The Ousoor Criminal Court examined witness testimony in a case involving an alleged altercation near an Anjaneya temple approximately ten years prior. The witness, a real estate businessman, testified that he signed a memo of facts prepared by police on the day of the incident. The court marked the witness's statement under Section 161 CrPC as hostile testimony upon the prosecution's request, noting contradictions with the witness's earlier police statement. Cross-examination of the hostile witness was conducted, and the witness confirmed the authenticity of his signature on the memo. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts