Ramachandran vs Kempanna — 200111/2014
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section Order7Rule1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.
OS - Original Suit (Title)
CNR: TNKI060001722014
Next Hearing
01st June 2026
Filing Number
200111/2014
Filing Date
27-08-2014
Registration No
200111/2014
Registration Date
27-08-2014
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate No. I Court, Hosur
Judge
2-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate No.I, Hosur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ramachandran
Adv. A.Chandrasekaran
Respondent(s)
Kempanna
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate No.I, Hosur
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
IA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 24-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 11-03-2026 | IA Pending |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 200111/2014 (OS 111-2014) Case: Ramachandran v. Kempanna | District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Hosur | Date: 16.03.2026 Outcome: The court recorded the cross-examination testimony of PW1 (Ramachandran, age 72), wherein the petitioner testified regarding disputed property matters, including Will Exhibit 10 and property ownership claims. The petitioner affirmed various facts about property inheritance from his father, government housing allotment, and ancestral land. The court accepted the witness's testimony and marked it as recorded. No final order on the substantive petition was issued in this excerpt—the proceeding documented the witness examination stage of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 200111/2014 (OS 111-2014) Case: Ramachandran v. Kempanna | District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Hosur | Date: 16.03.2026 Outcome: The court recorded the cross-examination testimony of PW1 (Ramachandran, age 72), wherein the petitioner testified regarding disputed property matters, including Will Exhibit 10 and property ownership claims. The petitioner affirmed various facts about property inheritance from his father, government housing allotment, and ancestral land. The court accepted the witness's testimony and marked it as recorded. No final order on the substantive petition was issued in this excerpt—the proceeding documented the witness examination stage of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts