Inspector of Police vs Sampangi Ramaiah Advocate - G.Kathiravan — 200035/2015

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379. Status: Judgement. Next hearing: 29th May 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNKI060001262015

Judgement

Next Hearing

29th May 2026

Filing Number

200035/2015

Filing Date

24-02-2015

Registration No

200035/2015

Registration Date

24-02-2015

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate No. I Court, Hosur

Judge

2-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate No.I, Hosur

FIR Details

FIR Number

259

Police Station

BAGALUR POLICE STATION

Year

2014

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 Section 379

Petitioner(s)

Inspector of Police

Respondent(s)

Sampangi Ramaiah Advocate - G.Kathiravan

Hearing History

Judge: 2-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate No.I, Hosur

27-05-2026

Judgement

26-05-2026

Questioning

25-05-2026

Evidence

22-05-2026

Evidence

18-05-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

18-05-2026
Copy of Oral Evidence/Deposition

Case Summary: CC No. 35-2015 This criminal case before the Osciur Magistrate Court involved an investigation into a theft of gold jewelry. During cross-examination, the respondent's counsel raised procedural irregularities in the investigation, including missing details regarding the time of the First Information Report, incomplete witness statements, and lack of investigation in specific areas mentioned in the complaint. The court accepted the witness deposition after verification and confirmed the statement through transcription. The case proceeded with witness examination and the court's ruling acknowledged the investigation deficiencies while accepting the available evidence on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC No. 35-2015 This criminal case before the Osciur Magistrate Court involved an investigation into a theft of gold jewelry. During cross-examination, the respondent's counsel raised procedural irregularities in the investigation, including missing details regarding the time of the First Information Report, incomplete witness statements, and lack of investigation in specific areas mentioned in the complaint. The court accepted the witness deposition after verification and confirmed the statement through transcription. The case proceeded with witness examination and the court's ruling acknowledged the investigation deficiencies while accepting the available evidence on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate No. I Court, Hosur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case