S.I.of Police vs Velu Advocate - M.Saravanan — 200050/2015
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 12th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNKI060000912015
Filing Number
200050/2015
Filing Date
24-04-2015
Registration No
200050/2015
Registration Date
24-04-2015
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate No. I Court, Hosur
Judge
2-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate No.I, Hosur
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
13
Police Station
BERIGAI POLICE STATION
Year
2015
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
S.I.of Police
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Velu Advocate - M.Saravanan
Govindaraj
Aravindkumar
Saravanan
Prasanth
Raja
Kumar
Krishnakumar
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate No.I, Hosur
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Judgement
Judgement
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 05-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 03-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 26-02-2026 | Judgement |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: C.C.No.50/2015 Court Decision: The court acquitted all eight defendants (Krishnakumar, Velu, Bevindhraj, Aravindkumar, Saravanan, Prasanth, Raja, and Kumar) of theft charges under IPC Section 379. The court found the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the defendants stole 165 iron bearing sheets from a school premises on January 12, 2015, citing contradictions in witness testimony and lack of credible evidence linking the stolen items' recovery to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: C.C.No.50/2015 Court Decision: The court acquitted all eight defendants (Krishnakumar, Velu, Bevindhraj, Aravindkumar, Saravanan, Prasanth, Raja, and Kumar) of theft charges under IPC Section 379. The court found the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the defendants stole 165 iron bearing sheets from a school premises on January 12, 2015, citing contradictions in witness testimony and lack of credible evidence linking the stolen items' recovery to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts