Arun kumar vs Ranga Reddy — 200306/2006
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section Order7Rule1. Status: IA Pending. Next hearing: 08th July 2026.
OS - Original Suit (Title)
CNR: TNKI060000332006
Next Hearing
08th July 2026
Filing Number
200306/2006
Filing Date
13-09-2006
Registration No
200306/2006
Registration Date
13-09-2006
Court
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate No. I Court, Hosur
Judge
2-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate No.I, Hosur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Arun kumar
Adv. K.v. Ramaraj
Respondent(s)
Ranga Reddy
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate No.I, Hosur
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
IA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | IA Pending |
| 12-03-2026 | IA Pending |
| 04-03-2026 | IA Pending |
| 23-02-2026 | IA Pending |
| 07-01-2026 | IA Pending |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: OS No. 306/2006 This is a deposition record from the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court in Hosur (dated 20.08.2025). The witness (PW1), a 65-year-old from Aripatty village, provided testimony in the original suit between Arun Kumar (petitioner) and Ranga Reddy (respondent). The witness's statement was recorded, read back, and signed by the witness in compliance with the Indian Evidence Act, 1873. The court admitted 17 documentary exhibits, including sale deeds, revenue records, and government correspondence related to the disputed property. The case has been adjourned for continuation of examination-in-chief based on the plaintiff's submissions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: OS No. 306/2006 This is a deposition record from the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court in Hosur (dated 20.08.2025). The witness (PW1), a 65-year-old from Aripatty village, provided testimony in the original suit between Arun Kumar (petitioner) and Ranga Reddy (respondent). The witness's statement was recorded, read back, and signed by the witness in compliance with the Indian Evidence Act, 1873. The court admitted 17 documentary exhibits, including sale deeds, revenue records, and government correspondence related to the disputed property. The case has been adjourned for continuation of examination-in-chief based on the plaintiff's submissions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts