SI of Police, Mathigiri ps vs Kaviyarasan Advocate - APP — 255/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 392, 397. Status: Trial. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNKI050018022022
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
Filing Number
277/2022
Filing Date
14-12-2022
Registration No
255/2022
Registration Date
14-12-2022
Court
Sub Court, Hosur
Judge
6-Additional Subordinate Judge, Hosur
FIR Details
FIR Number
186
Police Station
MATHIGIRI POLICE STATION
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SI of Police, Mathigiri ps (Police Station)
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Kaviyarasan Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Raja
Pavab Kalyan (Pavan)
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Additional Subordinate Judge, Hosur
Trial
Trial
Trial
Trial
Trial
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Trial |
| 02-04-2026 | Trial |
| 12-03-2026 | Trial |
| 19-02-2026 | Trial |
| 22-01-2026 | Trial |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: SC. 255/2022 Court: Additional Assistant Subordinate Court, Hosur Date: 12.03.2026 On 17.06.2022, a car driver (Rajkumar) was robbed at knifepoint by three assailants who took ₹2,000 and stole his vehicle (TN 70 T 4116 TATA ZEST). The victim filed a complaint on 18.06.2022. Following an identification parade on 29.08.2022, the three accused were identified and arrested. Witnesses testified before the court on 12.03.2026; no cross-examination occurred as the defense counsel was absent. Evidence including the recovered car and knife were marked as exhibits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: SC. 255/2022 Court: Additional Assistant Subordinate Court, Hosur Date: 12.03.2026 On 17.06.2022, a car driver (Rajkumar) was robbed at knifepoint by three assailants who took ₹2,000 and stole his vehicle (TN 70 T 4116 TATA ZEST). The victim filed a complaint on 18.06.2022. Following an identification parade on 29.08.2022, the three accused were identified and arrested. Witnesses testified before the court on 12.03.2026; no cross-examination occurred as the defense counsel was absent. Evidence including the recovered car and knife were marked as exhibits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts