Perumal vs Suresh — 400/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Status: Enquiry. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNKI050008292025

Enquiry

Next Hearing

11th June 2026

Filing Number

693/2025

Filing Date

30-10-2024

Registration No

400/2025

Registration Date

30-10-2024

Court

Sub Court, Hosur

Judge

1-Principal Subordinate Judge, Hosur

Acts & Sections

MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 166

Petitioner(s)

Perumal

Respondent(s)

Suresh

The Manager Iffco Tokio General Insurance company limited

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal Subordinate Judge, Hosur

12-03-2026

Enquiry

29-01-2026

Enquiry

11-12-2025

Counter

20-11-2025

Counter

23-10-2025

Counter

Interim Orders

12-03-2026
Copy of Oral Evidence/Deposition

Case Summary: 400/2025 On 12-03-2026, the Principal Subordinate Court, Hosur recorded the examination-in-chief of petitioner Perumal (28 years old) under Section 54(2) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1969. Perumal testified as the claimant in what appears to be an insurance/personal injury matter against Suresh and Iffco Tokio General Insurance Company, submitting medical bills totaling Rs. 3,62,855 along with supporting documents including FIR, discharge summary, insurance policy, and identification documents. The witness testimony was recorded, read over, and acknowledged as correct by Judge P. Shunmugaraj, M.L., with cross-examination noted as pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 400/2025 On 12-03-2026, the Principal Subordinate Court, Hosur recorded the examination-in-chief of petitioner Perumal (28 years old) under Section 54(2) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1969. Perumal testified as the claimant in what appears to be an insurance/personal injury matter against Suresh and Iffco Tokio General Insurance Company, submitting medical bills totaling Rs. 3,62,855 along with supporting documents including FIR, discharge summary, insurance policy, and identification documents. The witness testimony was recorded, read over, and acknowledged as correct by Judge P. Shunmugaraj, M.L., with cross-examination noted as pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Hosur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case