Venkatesh vs Muniyappan — 368/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Status: Appearance. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNKI050007972025
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
Filing Number
661/2025
Filing Date
25-03-2021
Registration No
368/2025
Registration Date
25-03-2021
Court
Sub Court, Hosur
Judge
1-Principal Subordinate Judge, Hosur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Venkatesh
Respondent(s)
Muniyappan
The Servicing Manager, Reliance General Insurance Company Limited
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal Subordinate Judge, Hosur
Appearance
Appearance
Enquiry
Enquiry
Ex-Parte Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Appearance |
| 05-02-2026 | Appearance |
| 11-12-2025 | Enquiry |
| 20-11-2025 | Enquiry |
| 23-10-2025 | Ex-Parte Evidence |
Interim Orders
In case MCOP 368/2025 before the Principal Subordinate Court, Hosur (dated 12-03-2026), petitioner Venkatesh testified regarding a two-wheeler accident claim against respondents Muniyappan and Reliance General Insurance. Venkatesh claimed he suffered injuries requiring hospitalization (10-13 January 2021) and sought compensation including medical bills of ₹87,022. The court recorded Venkatesh's examination-in-chief and cross-examination, wherein he disputed claims that he lacked proper driving license and insurance for the vehicle he was operating, and challenged the opposing party's vehicle inspection report. The order documents the witness testimony and evidence admitted, with the judge certifying the proceedings were recorded in open court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
In case MCOP 368/2025 before the Principal Subordinate Court, Hosur (dated 12-03-2026), petitioner Venkatesh testified regarding a two-wheeler accident claim against respondents Muniyappan and Reliance General Insurance. Venkatesh claimed he suffered injuries requiring hospitalization (10-13 January 2021) and sought compensation including medical bills of ₹87,022. The court recorded Venkatesh's examination-in-chief and cross-examination, wherein he disputed claims that he lacked proper driving license and insurance for the vehicle he was operating, and challenged the opposing party's vehicle inspection report. The order documents the witness testimony and evidence admitted, with the judge certifying the proceedings were recorded in open court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts