Prasanth vs Rivigo service private Limited — 322/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section U/s166. Status: Orders. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNKI050007512025
Next Hearing
08th June 2026
Filing Number
615/2025
Filing Date
28-08-2020
Registration No
322/2025
Registration Date
06-11-2020
Court
Sub Court, Hosur
Judge
1-Principal Subordinate Judge, Hosur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Prasanth
Respondent(s)
Rivigo service private Limited
ICICI Lombord general Insurance company Ltd.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal Subordinate Judge, Hosur
Orders
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Orders |
| 09-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 12-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 22-01-2026 | Arguments |
| 04-12-2025 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: MCOP 322/2025 - Prasanth v. Rivigo Service Private Limited and ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Ltd. In this motor accident compensation petition dated 17.07.2025, the court allowed partial compensation. The petitioner Prasanth sought damages for injuries sustained in a vehicle accident near Samalpalli while traveling. The court accepted a 15% disability assessment from the medical board and awarded Rs. 23,435 in total compensation, comprising Rs. 20,000 under one head and Rs. 3,435 under another, dismissing claims for permanent disability-related income loss and rejecting arguments that the accident resulted from the truck driver's negligence rather than tire failure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: MCOP 322/2025 - Prasanth v. Rivigo Service Private Limited and ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Ltd. In this motor accident compensation petition dated 17.07.2025, the court allowed partial compensation. The petitioner Prasanth sought damages for injuries sustained in a vehicle accident near Samalpalli while traveling. The court accepted a 15% disability assessment from the medical board and awarded Rs. 23,435 in total compensation, comprising Rs. 20,000 under one head and Rs. 3,435 under another, dismissing claims for permanent disability-related income loss and rejecting arguments that the accident resulted from the truck driver's negligence rather than tire failure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts