Inspector of Police, town ps vs Mohan @ Gym Mohan — 141/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 392, 397, 506(2). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 13th March 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNKI050006452023
Filing Number
1014/2023
Filing Date
27-04-2023
Registration No
141/2023
Registration Date
27-04-2023
Court
Sub Court, Hosur
Judge
6-Additional Subordinate Judge, Hosur
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
686
Police Station
HOSUR TOWN POLICE STATION
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Inspector of Police, town ps (Police Station)
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Mohan @ Gym Mohan
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Additional Subordinate Judge, Hosur
Disposed
Questioning
Trial
Trial
Trial
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Questioning |
| 19-02-2026 | Trial |
| 22-01-2026 | Trial |
| 27-11-2025 | Trial |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 141/2023 Court Decision: The Additional Sub Court, Hosur acquitted respondent Mohan @ Gym Mohan of charges under IPC Sections 392, 397, and 506(ii) (dacoity, attempt to commit dacoity, and criminal intimidation). The court found the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt and discharged the accused under Section 235(1) CrPC / Section 258(1) BNSS. Key Facts: Mohan was accused of threatening a pani puri vendor (witness) on 8.11.2016, brandishing a knife, robbing ₹1,500, and threatening bystanders. However, the court found critical inconsistencies: the complainant-witness gave contradictory statements between his written complaint and court testimony, and a second key witness admitted having no knowledge of the incident, rendering the prosecution evidence unreliable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 141/2023 Court Decision: The Additional Sub Court, Hosur acquitted respondent Mohan @ Gym Mohan of charges under IPC Sections 392, 397, and 506(ii) (dacoity, attempt to commit dacoity, and criminal intimidation). The court found the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt and discharged the accused under Section 235(1) CrPC / Section 258(1) BNSS. Key Facts: Mohan was accused of threatening a pani puri vendor (witness) on 8.11.2016, brandishing a knife, robbing ₹1,500, and threatening bystanders. However, the court found critical inconsistencies: the complainant-witness gave contradictory statements between his written complaint and court testimony, and a second key witness admitted having no knowledge of the incident, rendering the prosecution evidence unreliable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts