Inspector of Police, town ps vs Mohan @ Gym Mohan — 141/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 392, 397, 506(2). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 13th March 2026.

SC - Sessions Case

CNR: TNKI050006452023

Case disposed

Filing Number

1014/2023

Filing Date

27-04-2023

Registration No

141/2023

Registration Date

27-04-2023

Court

Sub Court, Hosur

Judge

6-Additional Subordinate Judge, Hosur

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

686

Police Station

HOSUR TOWN POLICE STATION

Year

2016

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 Section 392, 397, 506(2)

Petitioner(s)

Inspector of Police, town ps (Police Station)

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Mohan @ Gym Mohan

Hearing History

Judge: 6-Additional Subordinate Judge, Hosur

13-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

Questioning

19-02-2026

Trial

22-01-2026

Trial

27-11-2025

Trial

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
Copy of Judgment/Order

Case Summary: 141/2023 Court Decision: The Additional Sub Court, Hosur acquitted respondent Mohan @ Gym Mohan of charges under IPC Sections 392, 397, and 506(ii) (dacoity, attempt to commit dacoity, and criminal intimidation). The court found the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt and discharged the accused under Section 235(1) CrPC / Section 258(1) BNSS. Key Facts: Mohan was accused of threatening a pani puri vendor (witness) on 8.11.2016, brandishing a knife, robbing ₹1,500, and threatening bystanders. However, the court found critical inconsistencies: the complainant-witness gave contradictory statements between his written complaint and court testimony, and a second key witness admitted having no knowledge of the incident, rendering the prosecution evidence unreliable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 141/2023 Court Decision: The Additional Sub Court, Hosur acquitted respondent Mohan @ Gym Mohan of charges under IPC Sections 392, 397, and 506(ii) (dacoity, attempt to commit dacoity, and criminal intimidation). The court found the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt and discharged the accused under Section 235(1) CrPC / Section 258(1) BNSS. Key Facts: Mohan was accused of threatening a pani puri vendor (witness) on 8.11.2016, brandishing a knife, robbing ₹1,500, and threatening bystanders. However, the court found critical inconsistencies: the complainant-witness gave contradictory statements between his written complaint and court testimony, and a second key witness admitted having no knowledge of the incident, rendering the prosecution evidence unreliable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Hosur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case