Thangaraj vs D. Magendiran — 175/2023
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNKI050004702024
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
Filing Number
277/2023
Filing Date
22-09-2023
Registration No
175/2023
Registration Date
26-09-2023
Court
Sub Court, Hosur
Judge
1-Principal Subordinate Judge, Hosur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Thangaraj
Adv. MANOHARAN.M
Respondent(s)
D. Magendiran
The Branch Manager IFFCO TOKIO General Insurance Company Limited, Vellore
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal Subordinate Judge, Hosur
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Counter
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 05-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 11-12-2025 | Evidence |
| 20-11-2025 | Evidence |
| 16-10-2025 | Counter |
Interim Orders
This is a Motor Accident Claim Petition (MCOP 175/2023) before the Principal Subordinate Judge's Court, Hosur, dated 20.11.2025. Petitioner Thangaraj (age 35) testified as PW.1 under Section 54(2) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1969, presenting evidence in a motor vehicle accident claim case. The court recorded his examination-in-chief where he affirmed the truthfulness of his written statement and produced eleven exhibits including FIR copy, vehicle registration certificates, driving license, discharge summary (hospital records from June 2023), insurance policy documents, MVI reports, Aadhaar, PAN card, bank passbook, and medical bills. No cross-examination was conducted. The order represents testimony recording in an ongoing civil claim proceeding; no final judgment on the insurance claim has been rendered at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a Motor Accident Claim Petition (MCOP 175/2023) before the Principal Subordinate Judge's Court, Hosur, dated 20.11.2025. Petitioner Thangaraj (age 35) testified as PW.1 under Section 54(2) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1969, presenting evidence in a motor vehicle accident claim case. The court recorded his examination-in-chief where he affirmed the truthfulness of his written statement and produced eleven exhibits including FIR copy, vehicle registration certificates, driving license, discharge summary (hospital records from June 2023), insurance policy documents, MVI reports, Aadhaar, PAN card, bank passbook, and medical bills. No cross-examination was conducted. The order represents testimony recording in an ongoing civil claim proceeding; no final judgment on the insurance claim has been rendered at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts