Thangaraj vs D. Magendiran — 175/2023

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNKI050004702024

Evidence

Next Hearing

11th June 2026

Filing Number

277/2023

Filing Date

22-09-2023

Registration No

175/2023

Registration Date

26-09-2023

Court

Sub Court, Hosur

Judge

1-Principal Subordinate Judge, Hosur

Acts & Sections

MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 166

Petitioner(s)

Thangaraj

Adv. MANOHARAN.M

Respondent(s)

D. Magendiran

The Branch Manager IFFCO TOKIO General Insurance Company Limited, Vellore

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal Subordinate Judge, Hosur

12-03-2026

Evidence

05-02-2026

Evidence

11-12-2025

Evidence

20-11-2025

Evidence

16-10-2025

Counter

Interim Orders

20-11-2025
Copy of Oral Evidence/Deposition

This is a Motor Accident Claim Petition (MCOP 175/2023) before the Principal Subordinate Judge's Court, Hosur, dated 20.11.2025. Petitioner Thangaraj (age 35) testified as PW.1 under Section 54(2) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1969, presenting evidence in a motor vehicle accident claim case. The court recorded his examination-in-chief where he affirmed the truthfulness of his written statement and produced eleven exhibits including FIR copy, vehicle registration certificates, driving license, discharge summary (hospital records from June 2023), insurance policy documents, MVI reports, Aadhaar, PAN card, bank passbook, and medical bills. No cross-examination was conducted. The order represents testimony recording in an ongoing civil claim proceeding; no final judgment on the insurance claim has been rendered at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This is a Motor Accident Claim Petition (MCOP 175/2023) before the Principal Subordinate Judge's Court, Hosur, dated 20.11.2025. Petitioner Thangaraj (age 35) testified as PW.1 under Section 54(2) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1969, presenting evidence in a motor vehicle accident claim case. The court recorded his examination-in-chief where he affirmed the truthfulness of his written statement and produced eleven exhibits including FIR copy, vehicle registration certificates, driving license, discharge summary (hospital records from June 2023), insurance policy documents, MVI reports, Aadhaar, PAN card, bank passbook, and medical bills. No cross-examination was conducted. The order represents testimony recording in an ongoing civil claim proceeding; no final judgment on the insurance claim has been rendered at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Hosur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case