Srinivasan vs The Correspondent Swathy Matric Hr.Sec.School Hosur — 138/2006

Case under Tamil Nadu Motor Vehicle Rules 1989 Section 166. Status: Batta. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.

MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition

CNR: TNKI050000312006

Batta

Next Hearing

04th June 2026

Filing Number

138/2006

Filing Date

27-04-2006

Registration No

138/2006

Registration Date

10-07-2006

Court

Sub Court, Hosur

Judge

1-Principal Subordinate Judge, Hosur

Acts & Sections

TAMIL NADU MOTOR VEHICLE RULES 1989 Section 166

Petitioner(s)

Srinivasan

Adv. AADHI VENKATACHALAM

Respondent(s)

The Correspondent Swathy Matric Hr.Sec.School Hosur

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal Subordinate Judge, Hosur

30-04-2026

Batta

09-04-2026

Batta

12-03-2026

Issue of Service

12-02-2026

Evidence

29-01-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

20-11-2025
Copy of Oral Evidence/Deposition

Case Summary: MCOP 138/2006 - Srinivasan v. The Correspondent Swathy Matric Hr.Sec.School Hosur This motor vehicle accident case involved Srinivasan (petitioner) disputing liability for a collision involving auto TN 29 W 0147. During cross-examination, Srinivasan denied negligent driving and contested claims of permanent disability or income loss resulting from the accident. The court found insufficient evidence of driver negligence and determined Srinivasan was not entitled to full compensation. Cross-examination of the third respondent was noted as not applicable. The case proceeded through witness testimony with the Principal Subordinate Judge of Hosur recording the examination on 20.11.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MCOP 138/2006 - Srinivasan v. The Correspondent Swathy Matric Hr.Sec.School Hosur This motor vehicle accident case involved Srinivasan (petitioner) disputing liability for a collision involving auto TN 29 W 0147. During cross-examination, Srinivasan denied negligent driving and contested claims of permanent disability or income loss resulting from the accident. The court found insufficient evidence of driver negligence and determined Srinivasan was not entitled to full compensation. Cross-examination of the third respondent was noted as not applicable. The case proceeded through witness testimony with the Principal Subordinate Judge of Hosur recording the examination on 20.11.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Hosur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case