Srinivasan vs The Correspondent Swathy Matric Hr.Sec.School Hosur — 138/2006
Case under Tamil Nadu Motor Vehicle Rules 1989 Section 166. Status: Batta. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNKI050000312006
Next Hearing
04th June 2026
Filing Number
138/2006
Filing Date
27-04-2006
Registration No
138/2006
Registration Date
10-07-2006
Court
Sub Court, Hosur
Judge
1-Principal Subordinate Judge, Hosur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Srinivasan
Adv. AADHI VENKATACHALAM
Respondent(s)
The Correspondent Swathy Matric Hr.Sec.School Hosur
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal Subordinate Judge, Hosur
Batta
Batta
Issue of Service
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Batta |
| 09-04-2026 | Batta |
| 12-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 12-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 29-01-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: MCOP 138/2006 - Srinivasan v. The Correspondent Swathy Matric Hr.Sec.School Hosur This motor vehicle accident case involved Srinivasan (petitioner) disputing liability for a collision involving auto TN 29 W 0147. During cross-examination, Srinivasan denied negligent driving and contested claims of permanent disability or income loss resulting from the accident. The court found insufficient evidence of driver negligence and determined Srinivasan was not entitled to full compensation. Cross-examination of the third respondent was noted as not applicable. The case proceeded through witness testimony with the Principal Subordinate Judge of Hosur recording the examination on 20.11.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: MCOP 138/2006 - Srinivasan v. The Correspondent Swathy Matric Hr.Sec.School Hosur This motor vehicle accident case involved Srinivasan (petitioner) disputing liability for a collision involving auto TN 29 W 0147. During cross-examination, Srinivasan denied negligent driving and contested claims of permanent disability or income loss resulting from the accident. The court found insufficient evidence of driver negligence and determined Srinivasan was not entitled to full compensation. Cross-examination of the third respondent was noted as not applicable. The case proceeded through witness testimony with the Principal Subordinate Judge of Hosur recording the examination on 20.11.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts