K.C. Pedda Muni Reddy vs Thimma Reddy — 100008/2015
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section 96order41Rule1. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
AS - Appeal Suit
CNR: TNKI050000182015
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
Filing Date
06-04-2015
Registration No
100008/2015
Registration Date
10-04-2015
Court
Sub Court, Hosur
Judge
6-Additional Subordinate Judge, Hosur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
K.C. Pedda Muni Reddy
Adv. RAJENDRAN.M
Respondent(s)
Thimma Reddy
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Additional Subordinate Judge, Hosur
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 22-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 09-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 12-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 26-02-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: K.C. Pedda Muni Reddy v. Thimma Reddy (Case 100008/2015) Court: Additional Sub Court, Hosur Date: 11 January 2021 Outcome: The trial court's judgment awarding title to plaintiffs was set aside and remanded for fresh disposal. The appellate court found the trial court failed to properly appreciate genealogical evidence and determine the original property owner. The court partly allowed the defendant's petition to introduce genealogical trees as additional evidence, but dismissed the petition regarding settlement registers already on record. The case was remitted to the trial court to permit both parties to file genealogies, frame additional issues, and adduce evidence regarding ancestry before deciding title claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: K.C. Pedda Muni Reddy v. Thimma Reddy (Case 100008/2015) Court: Additional Sub Court, Hosur Date: 11 January 2021 Outcome: The trial court's judgment awarding title to plaintiffs was set aside and remanded for fresh disposal. The appellate court found the trial court failed to properly appreciate genealogical evidence and determine the original property owner. The court partly allowed the defendant's petition to introduce genealogical trees as additional evidence, but dismissed the petition regarding settlement registers already on record. The case was remitted to the trial court to permit both parties to file genealogies, frame additional issues, and adduce evidence regarding ancestry before deciding title claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts