SI of Police vs Venkatesan Advocate - RAJAGOPAL.M — 243/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,304(A). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNKI020040162022
Next Hearing
03rd June 2026
Filing Number
3581/2022
Filing Date
08-06-2022
Registration No
243/2022
Registration Date
08-06-2022
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Krishnagiri
Judge
3-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Krishnagiri
FIR Details
FIR Number
323
Police Station
KANDHIKUPPAM POLICE STATION
Year
2006
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SI of Police
Respondent(s)
Venkatesan Advocate - RAJAGOPAL.M
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Krishnagiri
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 29-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 10-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 02-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: CC No. 243/2022 This is a criminal case before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Krishnagiri, involving witness deposition proceedings. The document records the examination and cross-examination of PW3 (a 57-year-old textile trader) regarding a two-wheeler accident that occurred on 27.11.2006 at Bargur. The witness testified about the incident where the defendant's two-wheeler allegedly collided with another vehicle, causing injuries to the victim who was taken to government hospitals for treatment. The court concluded the witness examination with no further rejoinder examination noted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CC No. 243/2022 This is a criminal case before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Krishnagiri, involving witness deposition proceedings. The document records the examination and cross-examination of PW3 (a 57-year-old textile trader) regarding a two-wheeler accident that occurred on 27.11.2006 at Bargur. The witness testified about the incident where the defendant's two-wheeler allegedly collided with another vehicle, causing injuries to the victim who was taken to government hospitals for treatment. The court concluded the witness examination with no further rejoinder examination noted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts