Si of police vs Surender — 467/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 16th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNKI020021222026
Filing Number
2122/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
467/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Krishnagiri
Judge
8-Judicial Magistrate No. II, Krishnagiri
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
64
Police Station
GURUBARAPALLI POLICE STAION
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Si of police
Adv. ANANDHI P APP
Respondent(s)
Surender
Silambarasan
Hearing History
Judge: 8-Judicial Magistrate No. II, Krishnagiri
Disposed
Await Notice
Await Notice
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | Await Notice |
| 12-03-2026 | Await Notice |
| 10-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Crl.M.P. No. 467 of 2026 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate granted bail to accused Surendhar and Silambarasan in a theft case (u/s.306 BNS) after they spent 10 days in judicial custody. The court found that investigation was nearly complete with no need for further custodial interrogation, and prosecution raised no serious objections to bail. Conditions: Bail granted on Rs.10,000 bond with 2 sureties each, daily police reporting (10 A.M. and 5 P.M.), production of identification, and standard conditions prohibiting absconding, evidence tampering, and witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Crl.M.P. No. 467 of 2026 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate granted bail to accused Surendhar and Silambarasan in a theft case (u/s.306 BNS) after they spent 10 days in judicial custody. The court found that investigation was nearly complete with no need for further custodial interrogation, and prosecution raised no serious objections to bail. Conditions: Bail granted on Rs.10,000 bond with 2 sureties each, daily police reporting (10 A.M. and 5 P.M.), production of identification, and standard conditions prohibiting absconding, evidence tampering, and witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts