Inspector of Police vs Gopal — 185/2019
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 302,201r/w34. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNKI010056352019
Next Hearing
02nd June 2026
Filing Number
2719/2019
Filing Date
15-11-2019
Registration No
185/2019
Registration Date
15-11-2019
Court
Principal District Court, Krishnagiri
Judge
2-Additional District Judge, Krishnagiri
FIR Details
FIR Number
55
Police Station
KRISHNAGIRI TALUK POLICE STATION
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Inspector of Police
Adv. Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
Gopal
Sekar
Mahendra Kumar
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Additional District Judge, Krishnagiri
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 26-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 22-01-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
This document is a post-mortem examination record in a criminal case, not a final court order with a dispositive ruling. The document contains testimony from a chief medical examiner (Dr. Mahesh) describing autopsy findings on a 30-year-old male victim who died from severe injuries including multiple lacerations to the head, chest, and limbs, internal bleeding, and a fractured skull. While the doctor's testimony includes cross-examination on the wounds' nature and potential causes, the document does not contain a final judgment dismissing or allowing the petition, granting or denying bail, or any other substantive court order. SKIP — This is procedural evidence testimony, not a case disposition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document is a post-mortem examination record in a criminal case, not a final court order with a dispositive ruling. The document contains testimony from a chief medical examiner (Dr. Mahesh) describing autopsy findings on a 30-year-old male victim who died from severe injuries including multiple lacerations to the head, chest, and limbs, internal bleeding, and a fractured skull. While the doctor's testimony includes cross-examination on the wounds' nature and potential causes, the document does not contain a final judgment dismissing or allowing the petition, granting or denying bail, or any other substantive court order. SKIP — This is procedural evidence testimony, not a case disposition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts