K.Venkatesan vs Hassena — 51/2023
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section APPEAL. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 02nd April 2026.
AS - Appeal Suit
CNR: TNKI010047232023
Filing Number
980/2023
Filing Date
11-09-2023
Registration No
51/2023
Registration Date
22-09-2023
Court
Principal District Court, Krishnagiri
Judge
2-Additional District Judge, Krishnagiri
Decision Date
02nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
K.Venkatesan
Adv. KANNAIYAN.T.S
Kumar
Padmavathi
Respondent(s)
Hassena
Ayisha
Mumtaz
Jameel
K.H.Ameerjan
Mujibur Rahaman
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Additional District Judge, Krishnagiri
Disposed
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 17-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 12-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 09-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 51/2023 The Additional District Judge, Krishnagiri dismissed the appeal filed by K. Venkatesan, Kumar, and Padmavathi against the lower court's partition decree, confirming the Subordinate Judge's order granting a preliminary decree of partition allotting 7/96 shares each to plaintiffs Hassena and Ayisha with separate possession of the disputed 5.46 acres of agricultural land in Mookkampatti Village, Krishnagiri District (valued at Rs. 28,80,000). The appellants' challenge to the partition decision was rejected with no costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 51/2023 The Additional District Judge, Krishnagiri dismissed the appeal filed by K. Venkatesan, Kumar, and Padmavathi against the lower court's partition decree, confirming the Subordinate Judge's order granting a preliminary decree of partition allotting 7/96 shares each to plaintiffs Hassena and Ayisha with separate possession of the disputed 5.46 acres of agricultural land in Mookkampatti Village, Krishnagiri District (valued at Rs. 28,80,000). The appellants' challenge to the partition decision was rejected with no costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts