R G Chinnaraj vs Nagendran — 183/2025
Case under Hinduminorityandguardianshipact Section 6(a). Status: Appearance. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.
OP - Original Petition
CNR: TNKI010043942025
Next Hearing
06th June 2026
e-Filing Number
27-10-2025
Filing Number
1241/2025
Filing Date
30-10-2025
Registration No
183/2025
Registration Date
30-10-2025
Court
Principal District Court, Krishnagiri
Judge
1-Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
R G Chinnaraj
Adv. SENTHILRAJ R Y
Vasanthi
Adv. SENTHILRAJ R Y
Respondent(s)
Nagendran
Gandhimathi
Poonkuzhali
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri
Appearance
Appearance
Enquiry
Enquiry
Enquiry
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Appearance |
| 01-04-2026 | Appearance |
| 12-03-2026 | Enquiry |
| 27-02-2026 | Enquiry |
| 26-02-2026 | Enquiry |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 183/2025 Outcome: Interim visitation rights granted to paternal grandparents. The Principal District Court of Krishnagiri permitted grandparents R.G. Chinnaraj and Vasanthi to visit their 5-year-old granddaughter Lithanya every Saturday and Sunday at a nearby temple, pending resolution of the main guardianship petition. While the child's custody remains with her mother (3rd respondent), the court found that complete denial of access to paternal grandparents was not in the child's best interest, as grandparents play an important role in emotional development. The visitation shall be for reasonable duration at mutually convenient times, with respondents obligated to bring the child without fail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 183/2025 Outcome: Interim visitation rights granted to paternal grandparents. The Principal District Court of Krishnagiri permitted grandparents R.G. Chinnaraj and Vasanthi to visit their 5-year-old granddaughter Lithanya every Saturday and Sunday at a nearby temple, pending resolution of the main guardianship petition. While the child's custody remains with her mother (3rd respondent), the court found that complete denial of access to paternal grandparents was not in the child's best interest, as grandparents play an important role in emotional development. The visitation shall be for reasonable duration at mutually convenient times, with respondents obligated to bring the child without fail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts