R G Chinnaraj vs Nagendran — 183/2025

Case under Hinduminorityandguardianshipact Section 6(a). Status: Appearance. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.

OP - Original Petition

CNR: TNKI010043942025

Appearance

Next Hearing

06th June 2026

e-Filing Number

27-10-2025

Filing Number

1241/2025

Filing Date

30-10-2025

Registration No

183/2025

Registration Date

30-10-2025

Court

Principal District Court, Krishnagiri

Judge

1-Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri

Acts & Sections

HinduMinorityandGuardianshipAct Section 6(a)
GUARDIANS & WARDS ACT, 1890 Section 8,17

Petitioner(s)

R G Chinnaraj

Adv. SENTHILRAJ R Y

Vasanthi

Adv. SENTHILRAJ R Y

Respondent(s)

Nagendran

Gandhimathi

Poonkuzhali

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri

29-04-2026

Appearance

01-04-2026

Appearance

12-03-2026

Enquiry

27-02-2026

Enquiry

26-02-2026

Enquiry

Interim Orders

27-02-2026
Copy of Judgment/Order

Case Summary: 183/2025 Outcome: Interim visitation rights granted to paternal grandparents. The Principal District Court of Krishnagiri permitted grandparents R.G. Chinnaraj and Vasanthi to visit their 5-year-old granddaughter Lithanya every Saturday and Sunday at a nearby temple, pending resolution of the main guardianship petition. While the child's custody remains with her mother (3rd respondent), the court found that complete denial of access to paternal grandparents was not in the child's best interest, as grandparents play an important role in emotional development. The visitation shall be for reasonable duration at mutually convenient times, with respondents obligated to bring the child without fail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 183/2025 Outcome: Interim visitation rights granted to paternal grandparents. The Principal District Court of Krishnagiri permitted grandparents R.G. Chinnaraj and Vasanthi to visit their 5-year-old granddaughter Lithanya every Saturday and Sunday at a nearby temple, pending resolution of the main guardianship petition. While the child's custody remains with her mother (3rd respondent), the court found that complete denial of access to paternal grandparents was not in the child's best interest, as grandparents play an important role in emotional development. The visitation shall be for reasonable duration at mutually convenient times, with respondents obligated to bring the child without fail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Principal District Court, Krishnagiri All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case