Muniyammal vs The Superintendent of police — 152/2025
Case under Guardians & Wards Act, 1890 Section 6. Disposed: Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree on 12th March 2026.
OP - Original Petition
CNR: TNKI010036282025
e-Filing Number
08-09-2025
Filing Number
992/2025
Filing Date
09-09-2025
Registration No
152/2025
Registration Date
09-09-2025
Court
Principal District Court, Krishnagiri
Judge
1-Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Ex-Parte Decree
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Muniyammal
Adv. MAYAKANNAN G
Respondent(s)
The Superintendent of police
The District Collector, Krishnagiri
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri
Disposed
Orders
Ex-Parte Evidence
Enquiry
Counter
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-03-2026 | Orders |
| 19-02-2026 | Ex-Parte Evidence |
| 21-01-2026 | Enquiry |
| 08-12-2025 | Counter |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: GOP No. 152/2025 Decision: The court allowed Muniyammal's petition and appointed her as guardian of three orphaned minors (ages 15, 9, and 6) whose parents died—mother in 2021 and father (a police officer) in 2025. The petitioner is authorized to receive the deceased father's service benefits including family pension, gratuity, GPF, and insurance, to be used for the minors' welfare and education. Reasoning: The court found that the maternal grandmother is the fit and proper person to serve as guardian, as paternal grandparents are deceased, no other relatives came forward despite public notice, and she has already been caring for the minors' education and maintenance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: GOP No. 152/2025 Decision: The court allowed Muniyammal's petition and appointed her as guardian of three orphaned minors (ages 15, 9, and 6) whose parents died—mother in 2021 and father (a police officer) in 2025. The petitioner is authorized to receive the deceased father's service benefits including family pension, gratuity, GPF, and insurance, to be used for the minors' welfare and education. Reasoning: The court found that the maternal grandmother is the fit and proper person to serve as guardian, as paternal grandparents are deceased, no other relatives came forward despite public notice, and she has already been caring for the minors' education and maintenance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts