S.Kumar vs Prabu — 387/2021

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section OR7R1to6. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.

Issues Next hearing 24-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNKI010034982021

Filing Number

879/2021

Filing Date

20-Dec-2021

Registration No

387/2021

Registration Date

23-Dec-2021

Court

Principal District Court, Krishnagiri

Judge

1-Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section OR7R1to6

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.S.Kumar

    Adv. MANJUNATHAN.R

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Prabu

  2. 2.Ragu

Case History

  1. 24-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 22-Apr-2026

    Issues

    Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Issues

    Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri

  4. 30-Jan-2026

    Issues

    Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri

  5. 04-Dec-2025

    Issues

    Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri

  6. 10-Oct-2025

    Issues

    Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri

  7. 26-Aug-2025

    Issues

    Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri

  8. 21-Jul-2025

    Issues

    Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri

  9. 23-Jun-2025

    Issues

    Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri

  10. 24-Apr-2025

    Issues

    Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri

  11. 24-Mar-2025

    Issues

    Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri

  12. 28-Feb-2025

    Restored

    Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri

  13. 28-Feb-2025

    Enquiry

    Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri

  14. 28-Feb-2025

    Written Statement

    Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri

  15. 23-Dec-2022

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  16. 23-Dec-2022

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: O.S. No. 387/2021 - S.Kumar v. Prabu and Ragu The suit was decreed in favor of plaintiff S.Kumar on December 23, 2022. The defendants borrowed Rs.8,50,000 from the plaintiff on May 15, 2020, executing a promissory note with agreed interest of Rs.2 per hundred per month, but failed to repay despite legal notice. The defendants did not file a written statement or contest the case. The court awarded the plaintiff Rs.10,11,500 with 6% per annum interest on Rs.8,50,000 from the date of suit filing until realization. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  17. 23-Dec-2022

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri

  18. 22-Dec-2022

    Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF

  19. 22-Dec-2022

    Evidence

    Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri

  20. 17-Nov-2022

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri

  21. 13-Oct-2022

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri

  22. 29-Aug-2022

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri

  23. 27-Jul-2022

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri

  24. 08-Jul-2022

    Written Statement

    Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri

  25. 22-Jun-2022

    Written Statement

    Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri

  26. 21-Apr-2022

    Written Statement

    Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri

  27. 11-Mar-2022

    Vakalat / Memo of Appearance

    Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri

  28. 02-Mar-2022

    Vakalat / Memo of Appearance

    Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri

  29. 21-Jan-2022

    Issue of Service

    Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri

  30. 23-Dec-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  31. 20-Dec-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 387/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: O.S. No. 387/2021 - S.Kumar v. Prabu and Ragu The suit was decreed in favor of plaintiff S.Kumar on December 23, 2022. The defendants borrowed Rs.8,50,000 from the plaintiff on May 15, 2020, executing a promissory note with agreed interest of Rs.2 per hundred per month, but failed to repay despite legal notice. The defendants did not file a written statement or contest the case. The court awarded the plaintiff Rs.10,11,500 with 6% per annum interest on Rs.8,50,000 from the date of suit filing until realization. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case