D.Kamalanathan vs Sangeetha — 311/2022
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section O7,R1T06. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNKI010025852022
Next Hearing
04th June 2026
Filing Number
593/2022
Filing Date
19-07-2022
Registration No
311/2022
Registration Date
21-07-2022
Court
Principal District Court, Krishnagiri
Judge
1-Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
D.Kamalanathan
Adv. MANIRATHNAVEL.M.G
Respondent(s)
Sangeetha
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 25-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 05-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 19-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
This document contains cross-examination testimony from Defendant Sangeetha (DW.1) in O.S. No. 311/2022 before the Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri, dated 19.02.2026. The witness denies several key allegations: that she knew the petitioner D. Kamalanathan, that she borrowed money from him, that she received a legal notice on 15.05.2022, and that she accepted any payments from him. She disputes claims about property ownership, land transactions, and disputes arising from 2019 onward. The document is a transcript of her sworn testimony rejecting the petitioner's factual claims, but does not contain a final court order or judgment on the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document contains cross-examination testimony from Defendant Sangeetha (DW.1) in O.S. No. 311/2022 before the Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri, dated 19.02.2026. The witness denies several key allegations: that she knew the petitioner D. Kamalanathan, that she borrowed money from him, that she received a legal notice on 15.05.2022, and that she accepted any payments from him. She disputes claims about property ownership, land transactions, and disputes arising from 2019 onward. The document is a transcript of her sworn testimony rejecting the petitioner's factual claims, but does not contain a final court order or judgment on the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts