Shriram Fin. Ltd., M.Sakthivel vs Mohanasundaram — 94/2023
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section OR21,RUL11. Status: For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
EP - Execution Petition
CNR: TNKI010022112023
Next Hearing
10th June 2026
Filing Number
447/2023
Filing Date
25-04-2023
Registration No
94/2023
Registration Date
23-11-2023
Court
Principal District Court, Krishnagiri
Judge
1-Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shriram Fin. Ltd., M.Sakthivel
Adv. NAGASUDHA.B
Respondent(s)
Mohanasundaram
Murali
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri
For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim
For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim
Batta
Batta
Batta
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim |
| 18-03-2026 | For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim |
| 12-03-2026 | Batta |
| 05-02-2026 | Batta |
| 18-12-2025 | Batta |
Interim Orders
In E.P. No. 94/2023 before the Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri, PW.1 (Siva) was solemnly affirmed on 21.11.2025. The witness, a Shriram Finance employee, testified that respondent Mohanasundaram borrowed ₹3,00,000 from the company, repaid only ₹90,000, and currently operates a Tata vehicle with annual income of ₹5,00,000, with vehicle documents held by Shriram Finance. The court recorded the witness's statement as correct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
In E.P. No. 94/2023 before the Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri, PW.1 (Siva) was solemnly affirmed on 21.11.2025. The witness, a Shriram Finance employee, testified that respondent Mohanasundaram borrowed ₹3,00,000 from the company, repaid only ₹90,000, and currently operates a Tata vehicle with annual income of ₹5,00,000, with vehicle documents held by Shriram Finance. The court recorded the witness's statement as correct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts