M/S.Shriram Finance Limited, Representative M.Sakthivel vs Loganathan — 55/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section OR21R11. Status: For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim. Next hearing: 24th July 2026.
EP - Execution Petition
CNR: TNKI010022012023
Filing Number
437/2023
Filing Date
25-Apr-2023
Registration No
55/2023
Registration Date
09-Aug-2023
Court
Principal District Court, Krishnagiri
Judge
1-Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri
Last updated 28-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S.Shriram Finance Limited, Representative M.Sakthivel
Adv. NAGASUDHA.B
Respondent(s)
-
1.Loganathan
-
2.Manokaran
Case History
-
24-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
30-Apr-2026
For Attachment/ Arrest /Garnishee Proceedings / Deposit / Payment / Claim
Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri
-
16-Apr-2026
Batta
Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri
-
10-Apr-2026
Copy of Oral Evidence/DepositionView PDF
In E.P. No. 55/2023, Shriram Finance Limited's witness (PW.1) was solemnly affirmed on 10.04.2026 before the Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri. The witness testified that the respondents obtained a loan of ₹4,00,000 to purchase a 2007 Tata Sumo Spacio-P vehicle, with annual income of ₹5,00,000, but failed to make payments despite capacity; consequently, the petitioner filed this case for recovery. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
Orders
Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri
-
12-Mar-2026
Evidence
Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri
-
18-Feb-2026
Evidence
Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri
-
23-Jan-2026
Evidence
Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri
-
13-Nov-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri
-
17-Oct-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri
-
12-Sep-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri
-
14-Aug-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri
-
08-Aug-2025
Amendment
Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri
-
23-Jul-2025
Steps
Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri
-
16-Jul-2025
Steps
Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri
-
26-Jun-2025
Steps
Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri
-
05-Jun-2025
Steps
Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri
-
29-Apr-2025
Steps
Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri
-
17-Apr-2025
Steps
Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri
-
19-Mar-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri
-
19-Feb-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri
-
01-Feb-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri
-
28-Jan-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri
-
10-Jan-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri
-
02-Jan-2025
Evidence
Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri
-
07-Dec-2024
Evidence
Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri
-
22-Nov-2024
Evidence
Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri
-
17-Oct-2024
Evidence
Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri
-
19-Sep-2024
Evidence
Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri
-
29-Aug-2024
Evidence
Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri
-
08-Aug-2024
Evidence
Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri
-
19-Jul-2024
Evidence
Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri
-
25-Jun-2024
Evidence
Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri
-
07-Jun-2024
Evidence
Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri
-
18-Apr-2024
Counter
Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri
-
27-Mar-2024
Counter
Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri
-
01-Mar-2024
Counter
Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri
-
01-Feb-2024
Counter
Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri
-
04-Jan-2024
Counter
Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri
-
08-Dec-2023
Counter
Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri
-
22-Nov-2023
Await Reports
Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri
-
15-Sep-2023
Issue of Service
Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri
-
09-Aug-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Apr-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 55/2023
In E.P. No. 55/2023, Shriram Finance Limited's witness (PW.1) was solemnly affirmed on 10.04.2026 before the Principal District Judge, Krishnagiri. The witness testified that the respondents obtained a loan of ₹4,00,000 to purchase a 2007 Tata Sumo Spacio-P vehicle, with annual income of ₹5,00,000, but failed to make payments despite capacity; consequently, the petitioner filed this case for recovery. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts